Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Half-dose fulvestrant plus anastrozole as a first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Huang, Xiaoting; Weng, Xiuhua; Lin, Shen; Liu, Yiwei; Luo, Shaohong; Wang, Hang; Ming, Wai-Kit; Huang, Pinfang.
Afiliação
  • Huang X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Weng X; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Lin S; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Liu Y; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Luo S; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Wang H; Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Ming WK; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China abstract2016@163.com wkming@connect.hku.hk.
  • Huang P; Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
BMJ Open ; 10(8): e036107, 2020 08 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32868353
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The S0226 trial demonstrated that the combination of half-dose fulvestrant (FUL) and anastrozole (ANA) (F&A) caused a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus ANA monotherapy for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (PMW-MBC (HR+)). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of F&A in the first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+) in China.

DESIGN:

We constructed a Markov model over a life-time horizon. The clinical outcomes and utility data were obtained from published literature. Cost data were obtained from official Chinese websites. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test result uncertainty.

SETTING:

Chinese healthcare system perspective. POPULATION A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with PMW-MBC (HR+).

INTERVENTIONS:

F&A compared with full-dose FUL and ANAmonotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The main outcome of this study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).

RESULTS:

ANA was estimated to have the lowest cost and minimum life-years. The ICER of F&A versus ANA was US$15 665.891/QALY with incremental cost and QALY of US$12 401.120 and 0.792, respectively, which was less than the willingness-to-pay of US$29 383/QALY. Compared with F&A, FUL yielded a higher cost and a shorter lifetime; hence, it was identified as a dominated strategy. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the price of FUL was the most influential factor in our study. The probability that F&A was cost-effective at a threshold of US$29 383/QALY in China was 86.5%.

CONCLUSION:

F&A is a cost-effective alternative to FUL and ANA monotherapy for the first-line treatment of PMW-MBC (HR+) in China. F&A is a promising first-line treatment for PMW-MBC (HR+), and more research is needed to evaluate the economy of using F&A in other countries.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Fulvestranto / Anastrozol Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Fulvestranto / Anastrozol Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article