Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Marine biomonitoring with eDNA: Can metabarcoding of water samples cut it as a tool for surveying benthic communities?
Antich, Adrià; Palacín, Cruz; Cebrian, Emma; Golo, Raül; Wangensteen, Owen S; Turon, Xavier.
Afiliação
  • Antich A; Department of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
  • Palacín C; Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, University of Barcelona, and Research Institute of Biodiversity (IRBIO), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Cebrian E; Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
  • Golo R; Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
  • Wangensteen OS; Norwegian College of Fishery Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Turon X; Department of Marine Ecology, Center for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB-CSIC), Girona, Spain.
Mol Ecol ; 30(13): 3175-3188, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974967
ABSTRACT
In the marine realm, biomonitoring using environmental DNA (eDNA) of benthic communities requires destructive direct sampling or the setting-up of settlement structures. Comparatively much less effort is required to sample the water column, which can be accessed remotely. In this study we assess the feasibility of obtaining information from the eukaryotic benthic communities by sampling the adjacent water layer. We studied two different rocky-substrate benthic communities with a technique based on quadrat sampling. We also took replicate water samples at four distances (0, 0.5, 1.5, and 20 m) from the benthic habitat. Using broad range primers to amplify a ca. 313 bp fragment of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene, we obtained a total of 3,543 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). The structure obtained in the two environments was markedly different, with Metazoa, Archaeplastida and Stramenopiles being the most diverse groups in benthic samples, and Hacrobia, Metazoa and Alveolata in the water. Only 265 MOTUs (7.5%) were shared between benthos and water samples and, of these, 180 (5.1%) were identified as benthic taxa that left their DNA in the water. Most of them were found immediately adjacent to the benthos, and their number decreased as we moved apart from the benthic habitat. It was concluded that water eDNA, even in the close vicinity of the benthos, was a poor proxy for the analysis of benthic structure, and that direct sampling methods are required for monitoring these complex communities via metabarcoding.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico / Monitoramento Biológico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Código de Barras de DNA Taxonômico / Monitoramento Biológico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article