Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Diuresis Patterns in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Retrospective Analysis.
Broscious, Rachael; Kukin, Alina; Noel, Zachary R; Devabhakthuni, Sandeep; Seung, Hyunuk; Ramani, Gautam V; Reed, Brent N.
Afiliação
  • Broscious R; Department of Pharmacy, 5631West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Kukin A; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 15513University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Noel ZR; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 15513University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Devabhakthuni S; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 15513University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Seung H; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 15513University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Ramani GV; Department of Medicine, 15513University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Reed BN; Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 15513University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther ; 26(2): 165-172, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975450
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Congestion predominates in exacerbations of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but evidence suggests that excess volume may be distributed differently in these 2 subgroups. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

In this retrospective study, diuretic efficiency (DE, or net urine output per 40-mg of intravenous furosemide equivalent) during the first 72 hours was compared between patients hospitalized with HFrEF (n = 121) versus HFpEF (n = 120). Multivariate analysis was used to compare the 2 groups based on expected baseline differences (e.g., demographics, heart failure etiology, concomitant therapy). During the first 72 hours, mean daily diuretic doses were higher in patients with HFpEF versus HFrEF (172.0 vs. 159.9 mg, respectively, P = 0.026) but urine output was not significantly different (2603.3 mL vs. 2667.5 mL, respectively, adjusted P = 0.100). Similarly, mean cumulative DE did not differ (-673.5 vs. -637.8 mL/40-mg in the HFrEF and HFpEF groups, respectively, adjusted P = 0.884). An exploratory analysis of propensity-matched cohorts yielded similar findings. Correlations between the components of DE varied considerably and only became weak to moderately correlated toward the end of the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although cumulative DE did not differ between patients with HFrEF and HFpEF, variable correlations in the components of DE suggest there may be differences in diuretic response that warrant future analysis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Volume Sistólico / Diurese / Diuréticos / Furosemida / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Volume Sistólico / Diurese / Diuréticos / Furosemida / Insuficiência Cardíaca Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article