Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Higher Edmonton Obesity Staging System scores are independently associated with postoperative complications and mortality following bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP.
Skulsky, Samuel L; Dang, Jerry T; Switzer, Noah J; Sharma, Arya M; Karmali, Shahzeer; Birch, Daniel W.
Afiliação
  • Skulsky SL; Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Loeb Research Building, 725 Parkdale Avenue, Office WM150B, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. sskulsky@toh.ca.
  • Dang JT; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Switzer NJ; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Sharma AM; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Karmali S; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
  • Birch DW; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Surg Endosc ; 35(12): 7163-7173, 2021 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33155074
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Bariatric surgery is an evidence-based approach for sustained weight loss in patients with severe obesity. The most common procedures in North America are the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) is a tool that assigns patients a score of 0 to 4 according to their obesity-related comorbidities and functional status. Previous research demonstrates that increasing EOSS score is associated with overall non-operative mortality risk.

OBJECTIVE:

We sought to assess the association of the EOSS with major 30-day postoperative complications following LSG or LRYGB.

METHODS:

Primary LSG or LRYGB patients were identified from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. Patients were assigned EOSS scores according to their comorbidities and functional limitations extracted from the database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between EOSS score, age, sex, BMI, type of procedure, or operative time with 30-day major complications.

RESULTS:

From 2015 to 2017, 430,238 patients (79.4% female) who underwent primary LSG or LRYGB were identified. The relative frequencies of patients by EOSS score were 0 and 1 (23.9%), 2 (62.8%), 3 (10.5%), and 4 (2.9%). Mean preoperative BMI was 45.4 (SD 7.9) kg/m2 and mean age was 44.6 (SD 12.0) years. The overall 30-day major complication rate was 3.5%. EOSS 2, 3, and 4 were significantly associated with major complications. The strongest associations with major complications were EOSS 4 (OR 2.30; 95% CI 2.11-2.51, p < 0.001) and LRYGB versus LSG (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.97-2.11, p < 0.001). EOSS 3 and 4 were most strongly associated with death.

CONCLUSION:

Higher EOSS scores are independently associated with 30-day major postoperative complications and mortality. The EOSS provides utility in staging patients and identifying those at greater risk of postoperative complications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Laparoscopia / Cirurgia Bariátrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Laparoscopia / Cirurgia Bariátrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article