Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model.
Kremer, Ingrid E H; Hiligsmann, Mickael; Carlson, Josh; Zimmermann, Marita; Jongen, Peter J; Evers, Silvia M A A; Petersohn, Svenja; Pouwels, Xavier G L V; Bansback, Nick.
Afiliação
  • Kremer IEH; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
  • Hiligsmann M; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Carlson J; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
  • Zimmermann M; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Jongen PJ; Institute for Disease Modeling, Bellevue, WA, USA.
  • Evers SMAA; MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Petersohn S; Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Pouwels XGLV; Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands.
  • Bansback N; Centre for Economic Evaluations, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Med Decis Making ; 40(8): 1003-1019, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33174513
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Up to 31% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) discontinue treatment with disease-modifying drug (DMD) within the first year, and of the patients who do continue, about 40% are nonadherent. Shared decision making may decrease nonadherence and discontinuation rates, but evidence in the context of RRMS is limited. Shared decision making may, however, come at additional costs. This study aimed to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of shared decision making for RRMS in comparison with usual care, from a (limited) societal perspective over a lifetime.

METHODS:

An exploratory economic evaluation was conducted by adapting a previously developed state transition model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a range of DMDs for RRMS in comparison with the best supportive care. Three potential effects of shared decision making were explored 1) a change in the initial DMD chosen, 2) a decrease in the patient's discontinuation in using the DMD, and 3) an increase in adherence to the DMD. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of a scenario that combined the 3 effects were conducted.

RESULTS:

Each effect separately and the 3 effects combined resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs due to the increased utilization of DMD. A decrease in discontinuation of DMDs influenced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) most. The combined scenario resulted in an ICER of €17,875 per QALY gained. The ICER was sensitive to changes in several parameters.

CONCLUSION:

This study suggests that shared decision making for DMDs could potentially be cost-effective, especially if shared decision making would help to decrease treatment discontinuation. Our results, however, may depend on the assumed effects on treatment choice, persistence, and adherence, which are actually largely unknown.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Adesão à Medicação / Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Adesão à Medicação / Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article