Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A transcriptomic signature to predict adjuvant gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Nicolle, R; Gayet, O; Duconseil, P; Vanbrugghe, C; Roques, J; Bigonnet, M; Blum, Y; Elarouci, N; Armenoult, L; Ayadi, M; de Reyniès, A; Puleo, F; Augustin, J; Emile, J F; Svrcek, M; Arsenijevic, T; Hammel, P; Giovannini, M; Grandval, P; Dahan, L; Moutardier, V; Gilabert, M; Van Laethem, J L; Bachet, J B; Cros, J; Iovanna, J; Dusetti, N J.
Afiliação
  • Nicolle R; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • Gayet O; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
  • Duconseil P; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Nord Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Vanbrugghe C; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Nord Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Roques J; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
  • Bigonnet M; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
  • Blum Y; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • Elarouci N; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • Armenoult L; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • Ayadi M; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • de Reyniès A; Tumour Identity Card Program (CIT), French League Against Cancer, Paris, France.
  • Puleo F; Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Delta Hospital, Center Hospitalier Interregional Edith Cavell, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Augustin J; Sorbonne University, UPMC University, Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpetriére Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Emile JF; Ambroise Paré Hospital, Boulogne, AP-HP, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Svrcek M; Sorbonne University, UPMC University, Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpetriére Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Arsenijevic T; Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Delta Hospital, Center Hospitalier Interregional Edith Cavell, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Hammel P; Department of Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Paris 7 University, APHP, Clichy, France.
  • Giovannini M; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille, France.
  • Grandval P; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Dahan L; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Moutardier V; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Nord Hospital, Marseille, France.
  • Gilabert M; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France; Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Marseille, France.
  • Van Laethem JL; Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Delta Hospital, Center Hospitalier Interregional Edith Cavell, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Bachet JB; Sorbonne University, UPMC University, Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpetriére Hospital, Paris, France.
  • Cros J; Department of Digestive Oncology, Beaujon Hospital, Paris 7 University, APHP, Clichy, France.
  • Iovanna J; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Electronic address: juan.iovanna@inserm.fr.
  • Dusetti NJ; Cancer Research Center of Marseille, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Paoli-Calmettes Institut, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. Electronic address: nelson.dusetti@inserm.fr.
Ann Oncol ; 32(2): 250-260, 2021 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33188873
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is the only systemic treatment approved for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a selection of regimens based on patients' performance status and expected efficacy. The establishment of a potent stratification associated with chemotherapeutic efficacy could potentially improve prognosis by tailoring treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Concomitant chemosensitivity and genome-wide RNA profiles were carried out on preclinical models (primary cell cultures and patient-derived xenografts) derived from patients with PDAC included in the PaCaOmics program (NCT01692873). The RNA-based stratification was tested in a monocentric cohort and validated in a multicentric cohort, both retrospectively collected from resected PDAC samples (67 and 368 patients, respectively). Forty-three (65%) and 203 (55%) patients received adjuvant gemcitabine in the monocentric and the multicentric cohorts, respectively. The relationships between predicted gemcitabine sensitivity and patients' overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were investigated. RESULTS: The GemPred RNA signature was derived from preclinical models, defining gemcitabine sensitive PDAC as GemPred+. Among the patients who received gemcitabine in the test and validation cohorts, the GemPred+ patients had a higher OS than GemPred- (P = 0.046 and P = 0.00216). In both cohorts, the GemPred stratification was not associated with OS among patients who did not receive gemcitabine. Among gemcitabine-treated patients, GemPred+ patients had significantly higher OS than the GemPred-: 91.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 61.2-not reached] versus 33 months (95% CI: 24-35.2); hazard ratio 0.403 (95% CI: 0.221-0.735, P = 0.00216). The interaction test for gemcitabine and GemPred+ stratification was significant (P = 0.0245). Multivariate analysis in the gemcitabine-treated population retained an independent predictive value. CONCLUSION: The RNA-based GemPred stratification predicts the benefit of adjuvant gemcitabine in PDAC patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Adenocarcinoma / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article