Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Prognostic Value of Metabolic Profiling in Older Patients With a Proximal Femoral Fracture.
van der Sijp, Max P L; Suchiman, H Eka D; Eijk, Monica; Vojinovic, Dina; Niggebrugge, Arthur H P; Blauw, Gerard J; Achterberg, Wilco P; Slagboom, P Eline.
Afiliação
  • van der Sijp MPL; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Suchiman HED; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Eijk M; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Vojinovic D; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Niggebrugge AHP; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Blauw GJ; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Achterberg WP; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
  • Slagboom PE; Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, South Holland, Netherlands.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 11: 2151459320960091, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33194255
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

High mortality rates of approximately 20% within 1 year after treatment are observed for patients with proximal femoral fractures. This preliminary study explores the prognostic value of a previously constructed mortality risk score based on a set of 14 metabolites for the survival and functional recovery in patients with proximal femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients admitted with a proximal femoral fracture. The primary outcome was patient survival, and the recovery of independence in activities of daily living was included as a secondary outcome. The mortality risk score was constructed for each patient and its prognostic value was tested for the whole population.

RESULTS:

Data was available form 136 patients. The mean age of all patients was 82.1 years, with a median follow-up of 6 months. Within this period, 19.0% of all patients died and 51.1% recovered to their prefracture level of independence. The mortality score was significantly associated with mortality (HR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.61-4.66; P < 0.001), but showed only a fair prediction accuracy (AUC = 0.68) and a borderline significant comparison of the mortality score tertile groups in survival analyses (P = 0.049). No decisive associations were found in any of the analyses for the functional recovery of patients.

DISCUSSION:

These findings support the previously determined prognostic value of the mortality risk score. However, the independent prognostic value when adjusted for potential confounding factors is yet to be assessed. Also, a risk score constructed for this specific patient population might achieve higher accuracies for the prediction of survival and functional recovery.

CONCLUSIONS:

A modest prediction accuracy was observed for the mortality risk score in this population. More elaborate studies are needed to validate these findings and develop a tailored model for clinical purposes in this patient population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article