Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Limb occlusion pressure for blood flow restricted exercise: Variability and relations with participant characteristics.
Evin, Heather A; Mahoney, Sean J; Wagner, Matt; Bond, Colin W; MacFadden, Lisa N; Noonan, Benjamin C.
Afiliação
  • Evin HA; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Mahoney SJ; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Wagner M; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Bond CW; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA. Electronic address: colin.bond@sanfordhealth.org.
  • MacFadden LN; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
  • Noonan BC; Sanford Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND, USA.
Phys Ther Sport ; 47: 78-84, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197877
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Assess lower-extremity blood flow restricted exercise (BFR) limb occlusion pressure (LOP) variability and identify related intrinsic characteristics using a portable Delphi BFR system.

DESIGN:

Repeated measures.

SETTING:

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS:

Forty-two healthy males (n = 25) and females (n = 17) (25.8 ± 5.2 y, 1.76 ±0 .09 m, 78.9 ± 14.9 kg) completed two visits. Brachial artery blood pressure, thigh circumferences (TC), and LOP were measured supine. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Linear mixed-effects models (LMM) and generalizability theory were used to evaluate LOP between legs and days, determine intrinsic characteristic relations, and assess random variance components.

RESULTS:

LOP was not different between legs (p = .730) or days (p = .916; grand mean = 183.7 mmHg [178.4, 189.1]). LOP varied significantly between participants (p = .011, standard error = 47.3 mmHg). 47% of LOP variance was between participants, 18% and 6% was within participants between days and legs, respectively, and 28% was associated with random error. The relative error variance was 14.4 mmHg. Pulse pressure (PP) (p = .005) and TC (p = .040) were positively associated with LOP. A LMM including PP and TC predicted LOP with a mean absolute difference of 11.1 mmHg [9.7, 12.6] compared to measured LOP.

CONCLUSIONS:

The relative error variance suggests that clinicians should measure LOP consistently for each patient to ensure BFR safety and effectiveness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional / Pressão Sanguínea / Treinamento Resistido / Perna (Membro) Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional / Pressão Sanguínea / Treinamento Resistido / Perna (Membro) Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article