Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Functional Recovery Rate: A Feasible Method for Evaluating and Comparing Rehabilitation Outcomes Between Skilled Nursing Facilities.
Johnson, Joshua K; Hohman, Jessica; Stilphen, Mary; Bethoux, Francois; Rothberg, Michael B.
Afiliação
  • Johnson JK; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic ad
  • Hohman J; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Stilphen M; Rehabilitation and Sports Therapy, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Bethoux F; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Rothberg MB; Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Community Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 22(8): 1633-1639.e3, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214047
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The recovery of patients' physical function and the rate at which this occurs are important parameters for evaluating value in post-acute care (PAC). However, no metrics are presently used to compare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) based on the functional recovery rates (FRRs) for patients in their care. The objectives of this study were to examine whether the average FRR differed significantly among SNFs and to compare the FRR to other measures currently used to assess care quality in SNFs.

DESIGN:

Retrospective observational study. SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

3913 patients discharged from hospitals in one health system to one of 10 partner SNFs between January 2017 and September 2019.

METHODS:

The FRR-the difference in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care 6-Clicks basic mobility score from SNF admission to discharge relative to the SNF length of stay (in days)-was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included metrics from the SNF Quality Reporting Program (functional recovery alone, discharge to the community, and 30-day hospital readmission). Differences in patients' outcomes between SNFs were tested using multiple regression in order to adjust for patient characteristics.

RESULTS:

Across the 10 SNFs, the highest adjusted mean FRR was 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55, 0.90] and the lowest was 0.39 (95% CI 0.33, 0.46) points per day. Two SNFs had an adjusted mean FRR statistically higher, and 2 had an FRR statistically lower, than the sample mean (0.50, 95% CI 0.48-0.52). SNF rankings varied by metric. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Individual SNFs vary in their mean FRR for patients making it a potentially useful measure of value for comparing SNFs. Standardized measurement and reporting of FRR could be beneficial to patients and their families as they consider specific SNFs for necessary post-acute rehabilitation and to hospital systems seeking to identify high-value PAC providers with whom to partner in collaborative care models.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem / Medicare Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem / Medicare Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article