Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a multiplex PCR assay to detect Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale in cattle in Uruguay in the absence of a gold standard test.
Parodi, Pablo; Corbellini, Luis G; Leotti, Vanessa B; Rivero, Rodolfo; Miraballes, Cecilia; Riet-Correa, Franklin; Venzal, José M; Armúa-Fernández, María T.
Afiliação
  • Parodi P; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Salud Animal, Estación Experimental INIA, Tacuarembó, Uruguay.
  • Corbellini LG; Laboratório de Epidemiología Veterinária, Facultad de Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Leotti VB; Departamento de Estatística, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Rivero R; Laboratorio Regional Noroeste "Miguel C. Rubino", División de Laboratorios Veterinarios "Miguel C. Rubino", Paysandú, Uruguay.
  • Miraballes C; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Salud Animal, Estación Experimental INIA, Tacuarembó, Uruguay.
  • Riet-Correa F; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Plataforma de Salud Animal, Estación Experimental INIA, Tacuarembó, Uruguay.
  • Venzal JM; Laboratorio de Vectores y enfermedades transmitidas, Facultad de Veterinaria, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
  • Armúa-Fernández MT; Laboratorio de Vectores y enfermedades transmitidas, Facultad de Veterinaria, CENUR Litoral Norte, Universidad de la República, Salto, Uruguay.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 33(1): 73-79, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252025
ABSTRACT
Detection of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma marginale is based on the reading of Giemsa-stained blood or organ smears, which can have low sensitivity. Our aim was to improve the detection of bovine Babesia spp. and A. marginale by validating a multiplex PCR (mPCR). We used 466 samples of blood and/or organs of animals with signs and presumptive autopsy findings of babesiosis or anaplasmosis. The primers in our mPCR amplified the rap-1a gene region of Babesia bovis and B. bigemina, and the msp-5 region of A. marginale. We used a Bayesian model with a non-informative priori distribution for the prevalence estimate and informative priori distribution for estimation of sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity for smear detection of Babesia spp. were 68.6% and 99.1%, and for A. marginale 85.6% and 98.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for mPCR detection for Babesia spp. were 94.2% and 97.1%, and for A. marginale 95.2% and 92.7%, respectively. Our mPCR had good accuracy in detecting Babesia spp. and A. marginale, and would be a reliable test for veterinarians to choose the correct treatment for each agent.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Babesia / Babesiose / Doenças dos Bovinos / Anaplasma marginale / Anaplasmose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Babesia / Babesiose / Doenças dos Bovinos / Anaplasma marginale / Anaplasmose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article