Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between FFRCT and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio (iFR) of Intermediate Lesions on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.
Beg, Faheemullah; Rehman, Hasan; Chamsi-Pasha, Mohammed A; Nabi, Faisal; Chang, Su-Min; Mahmarian, John J; Al-Mallah, Mouaz H.
Afiliação
  • Beg F; Section of Interventional & Structural Cardiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
  • Rehman H; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Chamsi-Pasha MA; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Nabi F; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Chang SM; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Mahmarian JJ; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America.
  • Al-Mallah MH; Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: mal-mallah@houstonmethodist.org.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 31: 57-60, 2021 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272881
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

New data suggests long term outcomes of coronary revascularization based on instantaneous wave free ratio (iFR) are equivalent to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR). We aimed to evaluate the correlation between non-invasive FFR derived from cardiac CT (FFRCT) and iFR.

METHODS:

Data from 21 patients with 26 vessels, who underwent both FFRCT computation and invasive iFR measurement, were analysed. We evaluated diagnostic performance of FFRCT according to two cut-off values of ≤0.80 and ≤0.70 with iFR ≤0.89 as the reference standard.

RESULTS:

In a per vessel analysis, the average diameter stenosis was 59%, mean FFRCT was 0.81 while mean iFR was 0.90. Using an FFRCT cut-off of 0.80, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy for FFRCT were 86%, 84%, 67%, 94%, and 85% respectively. When the cut-off was lowered to 0.70, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and overall accuracy for FFRCT were 57%, 100%, 100%, 86% and 88% respectively.

CONCLUSION:

FFRCT correlates well with iFR in this small retrospective study. Larger studies are required to confirm this finding.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Estenose Coronária / Reserva Fracionada de Fluxo Miocárdico Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article