Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass: a "post-code" lottery? A comprehensive national analysis of the utilization of bariatric surgery in Switzerland between 2011-2017.
Gero, Daniel; Schneider, Marcel A; Suter, Michel; Peterli, Ralph; Vonlanthen, René; Turina, Matthias; Bueter, Marco.
Afiliação
  • Gero D; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Schneider MA; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Suter M; Department of Surgery, Hopital Riviera-Chablais, Rennaz, Switzerland.
  • Peterli R; Department of Visceral Surgery, Clarunis University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Vonlanthen R; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Turina M; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Bueter M; Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: marco.bueter@usz.ch.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 17(3): 563-574, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33281057
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) recently became the most frequently performed bariatric surgery (BS) worldwide, overtaking the long-time standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Main indications for one or the other procedure show large inter-center variations and warrant further investigations.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to identify the influencers of primary BS selection in Switzerland.

SETTING:

Switzerland.

METHODS:

Retrospective analysis of all hospitalizations in Switzerland January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2017 with anonymized data provided by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. BS procedures were identified based on ICD-10 and national surgical codes. Statistical analyses were performed with R.

RESULTS:

During the study period 27,375 BS were performed. The annual BS caseload doubled over time, whereas inpatient complications decreased (∼-33%). RYGB was the prevailing procedure, although its annual proportion decreased from 80% to 70% over 7 years. Meanwhile, use of SG increased from 14% to 23%. Primary RYGB and SG had similar rates of inpatient mortality (∼.05%) and morbidity (8.0 versus 7.4%, P =.148), with the exception of higher ileus rates following RYGB (.7 versus .1%, P < .001). Patient-related factors favoring the indication of SG were male sex, extremes of age, and metabolic co-morbidities , while gastroesophageal reflux disease and private insurance-favored RYGB. Strikingly, differences between geographic regions outweighed patient-related factors in procedure selection inhabitants of German- and Italian-speaking areas had higher likelihood (OR 4.6; 3.9, P < .001) to receive SG than those in French-speaking areas.

CONCLUSION:

Geographic differences in primary BS procedure selection indicate a lack of objective rationales. Long-term risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to assist evidence-based decision making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Cirurgia Bariátrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Obesidade Mórbida / Derivação Gástrica / Cirurgia Bariátrica Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article