Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Waiting time for outpatient specialist care in Lombardy Region: evaluating accessibility and quality of information on websites of public health agencies and healthcare structures.
Magnoni, P; Carnevali, D; Cavazzana, L; Principi, N; Grimoldi, L; Marsilio, M; Castaldi, S.
Afiliação
  • Magnoni P; Postgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Carnevali D; Postgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Cavazzana L; Postgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Principi N; Postgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Grimoldi L; Postgraduate School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Marsilio M; Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Castaldi S; Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy - Quality Unit, Fondazione IRCCS "Ca' Granda" Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Ann Ig ; 33(1): 31-43, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354694
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Waiting time for outpatient specialist care is an ever-present problem for all Countries with a universal healthcare system. In Italy, information about waiting times must be available on all websites belonging to public health agencies and healthcare structures. The aim of the present descriptive study is to evaluate the accessibility and quality of such information on websites of all public health agencies and healthcare structures in Lombardy Region.

METHODS:

All websites belonging to 8 health agencies (ATS), 27 public hospitals (ASST), 4 research and teaching hospitals (IRCCS) were analyzed using a newly designed 30-item checklist. The items were scored 0/1 and grouped in five categories Accessibility, Architecture, Content, Interactivity, Utility.

RESULTS:

In all, 76.3% of websites reported their waiting times directly, but three did not update data at least monthly as required by current legislation. Less than half of websites provided information aimed at raising awareness and tackling no-shows, and only 10.5% explained the role of private practice in public structures when maximum waiting times are exceeded.

CONCLUSIONS:

The lack of exposition of waiting times on some websites belonging to ATS, ASST and IRCCS appears to be a relevant issue. There is also little empowering information that may help tackle waiting times themselves. These results warrant further efforts to improve accessibility, quality and transparency of information for all citizens.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Listas de Espera Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Saúde Pública / Listas de Espera Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article