Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Editor's Choice - Regional Versus General Anaesthesia in Peripheral Vascular Surgery: a Propensity Score Matched Nationwide Cohort Study of 17 359 Procedures in Denmark.
Bisgaard, Jannie; Torp-Pedersen, Christian; Rasmussen, Bodil S; Houlind, Kim C; Riddersholm, Signe J.
Afiliação
  • Bisgaard J; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: janniebisgaard@gmail.com.
  • Torp-Pedersen C; Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Rasmussen BS; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Houlind KC; Department of Vascular Surgery, Lillebælt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.
  • Riddersholm SJ; Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 61(3): 430-438, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33358100
OBJECTIVE: Cardiopulmonary comorbidity is common in vascular surgery. General anaesthesia (GA) may impair perfusion and induce respiratory depression. Regional anaesthesia (RA), including neuraxial or peripheral nerve blocks, may therefore be associated with a better outcome. METHODS: This was a nationwide retrospective cohort study. All open inguinal and infra-inguinal arterial surgical reconstructions from 2005 to 2017 were included. Data were extracted from national registries. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models and propensity score matching were used. The propensity score was derived by developing a model that predicted the probability that a given patient would receive GA based on age, comorbidity, anticoagulant medication, procedure type, and the urgency of surgery. Matching was performed in four groups based on American Society of Anesthesiologists' score I - II, score III - V, and gender. Outcome parameters included surgical and general complications (bleeding, thrombosis/embolus, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, cerebral, and >3 days intensive care therapy), length of stay, and 30 day mortality, hypothesising a better outcome after RA. RESULTS: There were 10 509 procedures in the GA group and 6 850 in the RA group. After propensity score matching, 6 267 procedures were included in each group. Surgical and general complications were significantly more common after GA in both matched (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001) and unmatched analyses (3.8 vs. 2.5%, p < .001 and 6.5 vs. 4.2%, p < .001). The 30 day mortality rate was significantly higher after GA, in matched and un matched analyses (3.1 vs. 2.4%, p = .019 and 4.1 vs. 2.4%, p < .001). There was no difference in length of stay. CONCLUSION: RA may be associated with a better outcome, compared with GA, after open inguinal and infra-inguinal peripheral vascular surgery. In the clinical context when RA is not feasible, GA can still be considered safe.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares / Anestesia por Condução / Anestesia Geral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares / Anestesia por Condução / Anestesia Geral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article