Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and Efficacy of Oral and/or Intravenous Tedizolid Phosphate From a Randomized Phase 3 Trial in Adolescents With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.
Bradley, John S; Antadze, Tinatin; Ninov, Borislav; Tayob, Mohammed S; Broyde, Natasha; Butterton, Joan R; Chou, Margaret Z; De Anda, Carisa S; Kim, Jason Y; Sears, Pamela S.
Afiliação
  • Bradley JS; From the Merck Research Laboratories, Rady Children's Hospital/UCSD, San Diego, CA.
  • Antadze T; Merck Research Laboratories, LTD M. Iashvili Children's Central Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia.
  • Ninov B; Merck Research Laboratories, UMHAT Dr. Georgi Stranski EAD, Pleven, Bulgaria.
  • Tayob MS; Merck Research Laboratories, Mzansi Ethical Research Centre, Middelburg, South Africa.
  • Broyde N; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
  • Butterton JR; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
  • Chou MZ; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
  • De Anda CS; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
  • Kim JY; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
  • Sears PS; Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(3): 238-244, 2021 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33395210
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tedizolid phosphate is an oxazolidinone prodrug approved in 2014 for treatment of adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs); however, efficacy has not previously been evaluated in children. This study compared the safety and efficacy of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) with active antibacterial comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents.

METHODS:

This was a randomized, assessor-blind, global phase 3 study of tedizolid versus active comparators for the treatment of Gram-positive ABSSSIs in adolescents (12 to <18 years of age; NCT02276482). Enrolled participants were stratified by region and randomized 31 to receive tedizolid phosphate 200 mg (oral and/or intravenous) once daily for 6 days or active comparator, selected by investigator from an allowed list per local standard of care, for 10 days. The primary endpoint was safety; blinded investigator's assessment of clinical success at the test-of-cure visit (18-25 days after the first dose) was a secondary efficacy endpoint. Statistical comparisons between treatment groups were not performed.

RESULTS:

Of the 121 participants enrolled, 120 were treated (tedizolid, n = 91; comparator, n = 29). Treatment-emergent adverse events were balanced between treatment groups (tedizolid, 14.3%; comparator, 10.3%). Overall, 3 participants (3.3%) in the tedizolid group and 1 (3.4%) in the comparator group experienced a single drug-related TEAE. Clinical success rates were high in both treatment groups 96.7% and 93.1% at the test-of-cure visit for the tedizolid and comparator groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Tedizolid demonstrated safety and efficacy similar to comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs in adolescents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tetrazóis / Infecção dos Ferimentos / Dermatopatias Bacterianas / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Oxazolidinonas / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tetrazóis / Infecção dos Ferimentos / Dermatopatias Bacterianas / Infecções dos Tecidos Moles / Oxazolidinonas / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article