Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide 3.0 mg and 4.5 mg Versus Dulaglutide 1.5 mg in Metformin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Controlled Trial (AWARD-11).
Frias, Juan P; Bonora, Enzo; Nevarez Ruiz, Luis; Li, Ying G; Yu, Zhuoxin; Milicevic, Zvonko; Malik, Raleigh; Bethel, M Angelyn; Cox, David A.
Afiliação
  • Frias JP; National Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Bonora E; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Nevarez Ruiz L; Hospital Angeles Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
  • Li YG; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Yu Z; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Milicevic Z; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Malik R; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Bethel MA; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Cox DA; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN cox_david_a@lilly.com.
Diabetes Care ; 44(3): 765-773, 2021 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33397768
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare efficacy and safety of dulaglutide at doses of 3.0 and 4.5 mg versus 1.5 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Patients were randomly assigned to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg, or 4.5 mg for 52 weeks. The primary objective was determining superiority of dulaglutide 3.0 mg and/or 4.5 mg over 1.5 mg in HbA1c reduction at 36 weeks. Secondary superiority objectives included change in body weight. Two estimands addressed efficacy

objectives:

treatment regimen (regardless of treatment discontinuation or rescue medication) and efficacy (on treatment without rescue medication) in all randomly assigned patients.

RESULTS:

Mean baseline HbA1c and BMI in randomly assigned patients (N = 1,842) was 8.6% (70 mmol/mol) and 34.2 kg/m2, respectively. At 36 weeks, dulaglutide 4.5 mg provided superior HbA1c reductions compared with 1.5 mg (treatment-regimen estimand -1.77 vs. -1.54% [-19.4 vs. -16.8 mmol/mol], estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.24% (-2.6 mmol/mol), P < 0.001; efficacy estimand -1.87 vs. -1.53% [-20.4 vs. -16.7 mmol/mol], ETD -0.34% (-3.7 mmol/mol), P < 0.001). Dulaglutide 3.0 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for reducing HbA1c, using the efficacy estimand (ETD -0.17% [-1.9 mmol/mol]; P = 0.003) but not the treatment-regimen estimand (ETD -0.10% [-1.1 mmol/mol]; P = 0.096). Dulaglutide 4.5 mg was superior to 1.5 mg for weight loss at 36 weeks for both estimands (treatment regimen -4.6 vs. -3.0 kg, ETD -1.6 kg, P < 0.001; efficacy -4.7 vs. -3.1 kg, ETD -1.6 kg, P < 0.001). Common adverse events through 36 weeks included nausea (1.5 mg, 13.4%; 3 mg, 15.6%; 4.5 mg, 16.4%) and vomiting (1.5 mg, 5.6%; 3 mg, 8.3%; 4.5 mg, 9.3%).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin, escalation from dulaglutide 1.5 mg to 3.0 mg or 4.5 mg provided clinically relevant, dose-related reductions in HbA1c and body weight with a similar safety profile.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Metformina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Metformina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article