Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
3D Micro-CT Analysis of Void and Gap Formation in Curved Root Canals.
Simsek, Neslihan; Keles, Ali; Ahmetoglu, Fuat; Akinci, Levent; Er, Kürsat.
Afiliação
  • Simsek N; Department of Endodontics, Inönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey.
  • Keles A; Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey.
  • Ahmetoglu F; Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey, Private Dental Clinic, Malatya, Turkey.
  • Akinci L; Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Dentistry, Samsun, Turkey, Private Dental Clinic, Malatya, Turkey.
  • Er K; Department of Endodontics, Inönü University School of Dentistry, Malatya, Turkey.
Eur Endod J ; 2(1): 1-5, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33403353
OBJECTIVE: This study used microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) to compare the volumes of voids and gaps in curved root canals instrumented and filled using various techniques. METHODS: Twenty extracted mandibular first molars with two curved mesial root canals were used. Root canals were instrumented using a self-adjusting file (SAF) or Revo-S file system. For standardization, mesiobuccal canals were instrumented with SAF and mesiolingual canals were instrumented with Revo-S in each root. The canals were divided into four experimental groups (n=10 in each). The canals were then filled via cold lateral compaction (CLC) or a thermoplasticized injectable technique (TT) using gutta-percha and AH Plus root canal sealer. The roots were scanned with a micro-CT, and the volumes of the voids and gaps were calculated using three-dimensional (3D) micro-CT images. Data were analyzed using unpaired t- and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: None of the tested techniques provided void- or gap-free fillings. Nevertheless, the SAF showed more gap formation than the Revo-S, and TT showed higher gap formation in all experimental groups. These differences, however, were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The SAF and Revo-S rotary file systems yielded comparable results. No statistically significant difference was found between the results of the various instrumentation and filling techniques.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article