Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society.
Marra, Giancarlo; Laguna, Maria P; Walz, Jochen; Pavlovich, Christian P; Bianco, Fernando; Gregg, Justin; Lebastchi, Amir H; Lepor, Herbert; Macek, Petr; Rais-Bahrami, Soroush; Robertson, Cary; Rukstalis, Daniel; Salomon, Georg; Ukimura, Osamu; Abreu, Andre L; Barbe, Yann; Cathelineau, Xavier; Gandaglia, Giorgio; George, Arvin K; Gomez Rivas, Juan; Gupta, Rajan T; Lawrentschuk, Nathan; Kasivisvanathan, Veeru; Lomas, Derek; Malavaud, Bernard; Margolis, Daniel; Matsuoka, Yoh; Mehralivand, Sherif; Moschini, Marco; Oderda, Marco; Orabi, Hazem; Rastinehad, Ardeshir R; Remzi, Mesut; Schulman, Ariel; Shin, Toshitaka; Shiraishi, Takumi; Sidana, Abhinav; Shoji, Sunao; Stabile, Armando; Valerio, Massimo; Tammisetti, Varaha S; Phin Tan, Wei; VAN DEN Bos, Willemien; Villers, Arnaud; Willemse, Peter-Paul; DE LA Rosette, Jean; Polascik, Thomas; Sanchez-Salas, Rafael.
Afiliação
  • Marra G; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
  • Laguna MP; D epartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Walz J; Department of Urology, Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Pavlovich CP; Department of Urology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
  • Bianco F; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Gregg J; Urological Research Network, Nova University, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Lebastchi AH; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Lepor H; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Macek P; Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rais-Bahrami S; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
  • Robertson C; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Rukstalis D; Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Salomon G; Department of Urology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
  • Ukimura O; Martini Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Abreu AL; Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Barbe Y; Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of South California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Cathelineau X; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
  • Gandaglia G; Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
  • George AK; Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Gomez Rivas J; Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Gupta RT; Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lawrentschuk N; Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Kasivisvanathan V; Department of Urology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Lomas D; Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
  • Malavaud B; Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Margolis D; Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
  • Matsuoka Y; Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Imaging, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Mehralivand S; Urology at Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Moschini M; Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Oderda M; Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • Orabi H; Department of Urology, Lucerne Kanton Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Rastinehad AR; D epartment of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • Remzi M; Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • Schulman A; Department of Urology, University of Assiut, Assiut, Egypt.
  • Shin T; Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Urology, New York, NY, USA.
  • Shiraishi T; Department of Urology, Döbling Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sidana A; Department of Urology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
  • Shoji S; Department of Urology, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
  • Stabile A; Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Valerio M; Division of Urology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Tammisetti VS; Department of Urology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Phin Tan W; Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • VAN DEN Bos W; Department of Urology, Vaudois University Center Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Villers A; Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Willemse PP; Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
  • DE LA Rosette J; Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Polascik T; Department of Urology, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
  • Sanchez-Salas R; Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 74(5): 581-589, 2022 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33439577
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localized PCa.

METHODS:

A 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, 1) the current/present role; 2) the potential/future role; 3) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold.

RESULTS:

Of 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (N.=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (N.=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (N.=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (N.=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localized PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article