Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The future of ocean governance.
Haas, Bianca; Mackay, Mary; Novaglio, Camilla; Fullbrook, Liam; Murunga, Michael; Sbrocchi, Carla; McDonald, Jan; McCormack, Phillipa C; Alexander, Karen; Fudge, Maree; Goldsworthy, Lyn; Boschetti, Fabio; Dutton, Ian; Dutra, Leo; McGee, Jeffrey; Rousseau, Yannick; Spain, Erica; Stephenson, Robert; Vince, Joanna; Wilcox, Chris; Haward, Marcus.
Afiliação
  • Haas B; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Mackay M; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Novaglio C; CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
  • Fullbrook L; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Murunga M; CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS 7004 Australia.
  • Sbrocchi C; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • McDonald J; School of Social Sciences, College of Arts, Law and Education, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 22, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • McCormack PC; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Alexander K; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Fudge M; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Goldsworthy L; Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, 2007 Australia.
  • Boschetti F; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Dutton I; Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Dutra L; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • McGee J; Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Rousseau Y; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Spain E; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Stephenson R; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Vince J; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Wilcox C; Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
  • Haward M; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS 7001 Australia.
Rev Fish Biol Fish ; 32(1): 253-270, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33456210
ABSTRACT
Ocean governance is complex and influenced by multiple drivers and actors with different worldviews and goals. While governance encompasses many elements, in this paper we focus on the processes that operate within and between states, civil society and local communities, and the market, including industry. Specifically, in this paper, we address the question of how to move towards more sustainable ocean governance aligning with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the UN Ocean Decade. We address three major risks to oceans that arise from governance-related issues (1) the impacts of the overexploitation of marine resources; (2) inequitable distribution of access to and benefits from marine ecosystem services, and (3) inadequate or inappropriate adaptation to changing ocean conditions. The SDGs have been used as an underlying framework to develop these risks. We identify five drivers that may determine how ocean governance evolves, namely formal rules and institutions, evidence and knowledge-based decision-making, legitimacy of decision-making institutions, stakeholder engagement and participation, and empowering communities. These drivers were used to define two alternative futures by 2030 (a) 'Business as Usual'-a continuation of current trajectories and (b) 'More Sustainable Future'-optimistic, transformational, but technically achievable. We then identify what actions, as structured processes, can reduce the three major governance-related risks and lead to the More Sustainable Future. These actions relate to the process of co-creation and implementation of improved, comprehensive, and integrated management plans, enhancement of decision-making processes, and better anticipation and consideration of ambiguity and uncertainty. Supplementary information The online version of this article (10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article