Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adherence of Mobile App-Based Surveys and Comparison With Traditional Surveys: eCohort Study.
Pathiravasan, Chathurangi H; Zhang, Yuankai; Trinquart, Ludovic; Benjamin, Emelia J; Borrelli, Belinda; McManus, David D; Kheterpal, Vik; Lin, Honghuang; Sardana, Mayank; Hammond, Michael M; Spartano, Nicole L; Dunn, Amy L; Schramm, Eric; Nowak, Christopher; Manders, Emily S; Liu, Hongshan; Kornej, Jelena; Liu, Chunyu; Murabito, Joanne M.
Afiliação
  • Pathiravasan CH; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Trinquart L; Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Benjamin EJ; Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Department of Epidemiology, Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Borrelli B; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • McManus DD; Center for Behavioral Science Research, Department of Health Policy & Health Services Research, Boston University Henry M Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Kheterpal V; Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
  • Lin H; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
  • Sardana M; Care Evolution, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Hammond MM; Section of Computational Biomedicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Spartano NL; Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Dunn AL; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • Schramm E; Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Nutrition, and Weight Management, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Nowak C; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • Manders ES; Care Evolution, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Liu H; Care Evolution, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Kornej J; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • Liu C; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
  • Murabito JM; Boston University's and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, United States.
J Med Internet Res ; 23(1): e24773, 2021 01 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33470944
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

eCohort studies offer an efficient approach for data collection. However, eCohort studies are challenged by volunteer bias and low adherence. We designed an eCohort embedded in the Framingham Heart Study (eFHS) to address these challenges and to compare the digital data to traditional data collection.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence of the eFHS app-based surveys deployed at baseline (time of enrollment in the eCohort) and every 3 months up to 1 year, and to compare baseline digital surveys with surveys collected at the research center.

METHODS:

We defined adherence rates as the proportion of participants who completed at least one survey at a given 3-month period and computed adherence rates for each 3-month period. To evaluate agreement, we compared several baseline measures obtained in the eFHS app survey to those obtained at the in-person research center exam using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULTS:

Among the 1948 eFHS participants (mean age 53, SD 9 years; 57% women), we found high adherence to baseline surveys (89%) and a decrease in adherence over time (58% at 3 months, 52% at 6 months, 41% at 9 months, and 40% at 12 months). eFHS participants who returned surveys were more likely to be women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.58, 95% CI 1.18-2.11) and less likely to be smokers (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.90). Compared to in-person exam data, we observed moderate agreement for baseline app-based surveys of the Physical Activity Index (mean difference 2.27, CCC=0.56), and high agreement for average drinks per week (mean difference 0.54, CCC=0.82) and depressive symptoms scores (mean difference 0.03, CCC=0.77).

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed that eFHS participants had a high survey return at baseline and each 3-month survey period over the 12 months of follow up. We observed moderate to high agreement between digital and research center measures for several types of surveys, including physical activity, depressive symptoms, and alcohol use. Thus, this digital data collection mechanism is a promising tool to collect data related to cardiovascular disease and its risk factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Aplicativos Móveis Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inquéritos e Questionários / Aplicativos Móveis Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article