Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Qualitative evaluation of the Autism Behavior Inventory: use of cognitive interviewing to establish validity of a caregiver report scale for autism spectrum disorder.
Pandina, Gahan; Ness, Seth; Trudeau, Jeremiah; Stringer, Sonja; Knoble, Naomi; Lenderking, William R; Bangerter, Abigail.
Afiliação
  • Pandina G; Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Pennington, NJ, 08534, USA. gpandina@its.jnj.com.
  • Ness S; Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
  • Trudeau J; Department of Patient Reported Outcomes, Janssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.
  • Stringer S; Evidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Knoble N; Evidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Lenderking WR; Evidera, Pharmaceutical Product Development, LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Bangerter A; Department of Neuroscience, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 19(1): 26, 2021 Jan 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33472654
PURPOSE: The Autism Behavior Inventory (ABI) is an observer-reported outcome scale measuring core and associated features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Extensive scale development (reported elsewhere) took place, in alignment with the Food and Drug Administration's patient-reported outcome guidance, to address the need for instruments to measure change and severity of ASD symptoms. METHODS: Cognitive interviewing was used to confirm understanding and content validity of the scale prior to its use in clinical trials. Respondents were caregivers of individuals with ASD (N = 50). Interviews used a hybrid of the "think-aloud" and verbal probing approach to assess ABI's content validity and participant understanding of the instrument, including: item clarity and relevance; item interpretation; appropriateness of response scales; and clarity of instructions. Audio-recordings of the interviews were transcribed for qualitative data analysis. The scale was revised based on participant feedback and tested in a second round of interviews (round 1 N = 38, round 2 N = 12). RESULTS: In total, 67/70 items reached ≥ 90% understandability across participants. Caregivers were able to select an appropriate response from the options available and reported finding the examples helpful. Based on participant feedback, instructions were simplified, 8 items were removed, and 10 items were reworded. The final revised 62-item scale was presented in round 2, where caregivers reported readily understanding the instructions, response options, and 61/62 items reached ≥ 90% understandability. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive interviews with caregivers of a diverse sample of individuals with ASD confirm the content validity and relevance of the ABI to assess core and associated symptoms of ASD.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidadores / Compreensão / Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto / Transtorno do Espectro Autista Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidadores / Compreensão / Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto / Transtorno do Espectro Autista Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article