Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients: a prospective randomized trial.
Osaki, M; Okuda, R; Saeki, Y; Okano, T; Tsuda, K; Nakamura, T; Morio, Y; Nagashima, H; Hagino, H.
Afiliação
  • Osaki M; Rehabilitation Division, Tottori University Hospital, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan. osakim@tottori-u.ac.jp.
  • Okuda R; School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
  • Saeki Y; Orthopedic Surgery Hospital Ward, Tottori University Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
  • Okano T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, San-in Rosai Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
  • Tsuda K; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saiseikai Sakaiminato General Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
  • Nakamura T; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hakuai Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
  • Morio Y; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Misasa Onsen Hospital, Tottori, Japan.
  • Nagashima H; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
  • Hagino H; Rehabilitation Division, Tottori University Hospital, Tottori, 683-8504, Japan.
Osteoporos Int ; 32(3): 495-503, 2021 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483796
We examined the effectiveness of coordinators' interventions to prevent secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures. These coordinator-based interventions improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates, and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following fractures. INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the efficiency of coordinator-based osteoporosis intervention in fragility fracture patients during a 2-year period. METHODS: A prospective intervention randomized control study was conducted at seven medical facilities from January 2015 to March 2017. Postmenopausal women and men over 50 years old with fragility fractures were randomly divided into the coordinator intervention (LI; 70 patients) and without intervention (non-LI; 71 patients) groups. The osteoporosis treatment rate, osteoporosis treatment persistence rate, fall rate, fracture incidence rate, and bone density measurement rate 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after registration were compared between the two groups. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze data at each inspection period. RESULTS: The osteoporosis treatment initiation rate was significantly higher in the LI group than in the non-LI group (85.7% vs. 71.8%; p = 0.04). The LI group had significantly higher bone density assessment implementation rates than the non-LI group at the time of registration (90.0% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.00) and 6 months after registration (50.0% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.01), but not 1 or 2 years after registration. In addition, no significant differences in fall or fracture incidence rates were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The coordinator-based interventions for fragility fractures improved bone density assessment implementation and treatment rates and enhanced treatment persistence rates in the early stages following bone fractures. The findings suggest that liaison intervention may help both fracture and osteoporosis physicians for the evaluation of osteoporosis and initiation and continuation of osteoporosis medication.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Fraturas por Osteoporose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Fraturas por Osteoporose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article