A Comparison of Ferric Subsulfate Solution, Silver Nitrate, and Aluminum Chloride for Pain Assessment, Time to Hemostasis, and Cosmesis in Acrochordon Snip Excision.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acrochordon (skin tag) removal by snip excision is a routine dermatologic procedure. Bleeding is a common sequelae of snip excision that requires hemostatic control. Chemical cautery is a common means of achieving hemostasis in this procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate three different chemical cautery solutions for their time to hemostasis, pain upon application, and associated pigmentary changes. METHODS: Twelve patients with six or more skin tags on the bilateral neck and/or axilla were enrolled. Two skin tags were cauterized with ferric subsulfate solution, two with silver nitrate, and two with aluminum chloride hexahydrate solution. Time to hemostasis and pain with application of each cautery solution to the skin tag was recorded. At a two-week follow-up appointment, patient satisfaction was assessed with a survey, and pigmentary changes were documented with digital photography. RESULTS: There was no significant variability in the time to hemostasis among the three chemical cautery solutions (p=0.57). Pain response was significantly different among the three solutions (p=0.003). Compared to silver nitrate (median=6.00, interquartile range [IQR] 4.50-6.50), aluminum chloride hexahydrate (median=1.00, IQR 0.50 to 6.00; Sidak p=0.02) and ferric subsulfate (median=1.50, IQR 0.00-3.50; Sidak p=0.01) had a significantly lower pain response. Among participants, three (25%) experienced a pigmentary change with ferric subsulfate, two (17%) with aluminum chloride, and six (50%) with silver nitrate (overall p= 0.14). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the three standard chemical cautery solutions for skin tag snip excision have significant differences in pain upon application and pigmentary changes. This might be a relevant consideration when selecting a chemical cautery solution.