Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient Experiences with Screening and Assistance for Social Isolation in Primary Care Settings.
Tung, Elizabeth L; De Marchis, Emilia H; Gottlieb, Laura M; Lindau, Stacy Tessler; Pantell, Matthew S.
Afiliação
  • Tung EL; Section of General Internal Medicine, Center for Health and the Social Sciences, and Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. eliztung@uchicago.edu.
  • De Marchis EH; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Gottlieb LM; Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Lindau ST; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Pantell MS; Department of Pediatrics, Center for Health and Community, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med ; 36(7): 1951-1957, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33532968
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Social isolation is a known predictor of mortality that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations in the USA. Although experts began to recognize it as a public health crisis prior to 2020, the novel coronavirus pandemic has accelerated recognition of social isolation as a serious threat to health and well-being.

OBJECTIVE:

Examine patient experiences with screening and assistance for social isolation in primary care settings, and whether patient experiences with these activities are associated with the severity of reported social isolation.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey conducted in 2018.

PARTICIPANTS:

Adults (N = 251) were recruited from 3 primary care clinics in Boston, Chicago, and San Francisco. MAIN

MEASURES:

A modified version of the Berkman-Syme Social Network Index (SNI), endorsed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; items to assess for prior experiences with screening and assistance for social isolation. KEY

RESULTS:

In the sample population, 12.4% reported the highest levels of social isolation (SNI = 0/1), compared to 36.7%, 34.7%, and 16.3% (SNI = 2-4, respectively). Most patients had not been asked about social isolation in a healthcare setting (87.3%), despite reporting no discomfort with social isolation screening (93.9%). Neither discomfort with nor participation in prior screening for social isolation was associated with social isolation levels. Desire for assistance with social isolation (3.2%) was associated with a higher level of social isolation (AOR = 6.0, 95% CI, 1.3-28.8), as well as poor or fair health status (AOR = 9.1; 95% CI, 1.3-64.1).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, few patients reported being screened previously for social isolation in a primary care setting, despite low levels of discomfort with screening. Providers should consider broadening social isolation screening and referral practices in healthcare settings, especially among sicker and more isolated patients who express higher levels of interest in assistance with social isolation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Isolamento Social / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Isolamento Social / COVID-19 Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article