Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality appraisal of educational websites about osteoporosis and bone health.
Lopez-Olivo, Maria A; des Bordes, Jude K A; Syed, Maha N; Alemam, Ahmed; Dodeja, Abhinav; Abdel-Wahab, Noha; Suarez-Almazor, Maria E.
Afiliação
  • Lopez-Olivo MA; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. amlopezo@mdanderson.org.
  • des Bordes JKA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Syed MN; Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 437, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Alemam A; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, BronxCare Hospital Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
  • Dodeja A; Division of Hospitalist Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Abdel-Wahab N; Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Suarez-Almazor ME; Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Arch Osteoporos ; 16(1): 28, 2021 02 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33566216
PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: Bone health education publicly available through the Internet, if evidence-based and unbiased, could help patients deal with issues such as decision-making, maintaining healthy lifestyles, using medications correctly, and improving their communication with health professionals. METHODS: We performed an environmental scan and quality assessment of the currently available osteoporosis and bone health patient education information on the World Wide Web. The sample websites were identified by using three separate search tools: Google Advanced, Bing, and Ask.com . Two independent investigators collected data and appraised the quality of selected websites. RESULTS: We identified 48 websites. Most websites were focused on risks factors of osteoporosis, preventive measures, screening recommendations, and topics to discuss with the physician. All websites provided adequate information describing treatment options; however, only 36% had information addressing duration of treatment, what happens when treatment stops, and the benefits and risks of various treatments. A total of 55% of the websites had their content updated to 2019 and 68% cited their sources of information to support their content. Reading levels ranged from 7.5 to 15.2 (higher than the recommended 6-grade level). CONCLUSIONS: Websites with information about bone health and osteoporosis commonly present information about initial treatment choices, but most fail to address risk-benefit issues, and common barriers than can occur throughout the course of the disease. In addition, many websites did not update their content, did not cite their sources of information, or were written at a 9-grade level or above (rendering them unsuitable for low-literacy populations).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Densidade Óssea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoporose / Densidade Óssea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article