Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Skin effect of facial cleansing combined with an electric sonic device.
Aiello, Laura Moretti; Vergilio, Mariane Massufero; Monteiro E Silva, Silas Arandas; Anselmo, Tamiris; Leonardi, Gislaine Ricci.
Afiliação
  • Aiello LM; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
  • Vergilio MM; Graduate Program in Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences - University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
  • Monteiro E Silva SA; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
  • Anselmo T; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
  • Leonardi GR; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 20(11): 3537-3544, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33619809
BACKGROUND: New technologies, such as sonic devices, have been developed to optimize the skin cleansing process and improve its efficiency. To evaluate the effectiveness of these cosmetic procedures, skin bioengineering is an objective method to assess the biophysical parameters of the skin. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the effect of facial cleansing on the physiological properties of the skin by comparing a cleansing process with cosmetic product applied manually to cleansing with cosmetic product associated with the use of an electric sonic device. PATIENTS/METHODS: A gentle skin cleanser was applied to the entire face of 12 subjects; the sonic device was used on one half of the face and the manual process was performed on the other half. Instrumental skin analyses included sebummetry, corneometry, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), infrared thermography, and high-frequency ultrasound and were measured before and up to 90 min after cleansing. Results were compared using two-way ANOVA and Friedman tests. RESULTS: Data obtained from the statistical analysis of sebummetry, TEWL, thermography, and ultrasound parameters did not show any significant difference. When assessing the corneometry parameters, a significant reduction in hydration values (17.19%) was observed in the manual cleansing area, while the values remained similar to baseline values in the area where the sonic device was used. CONCLUSION: The cleansing process with a sonic device did not cause a significant hydration reduction, suggesting better preservation of skin homeostasis when compared to manual cleansing.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Higiene da Pele / Cosméticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Higiene da Pele / Cosméticos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article