Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is disease activity prior to fingolimod initiation predictive of response? Fingolimod as a "common" first line treatment.
Pantazou, V; Du Pasquier, R; Pot, C; Le Goff, G; Théaudin, M.
Afiliação
  • Pantazou V; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratories of Neuroimmunology, Neuroscience Research Center , Lausanne University, Epalinges, Switzerland.
  • Du Pasquier R; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratories of Neuroimmunology, Neuroscience Research Center , Lausanne University, Epalinges, Switzerland.
  • Pot C; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratories of Neuroimmunology, Neuroscience Research Center , Lausanne University, Epalinges, Switzerland.
  • Le Goff G; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Théaudin M; Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. Electronic address: marie.theaudin@chuv.ch.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 177(8): 935-940, 2021 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637293
BACKGROUND: In countries where fingolimod is available as first-line therapy without restrictions, we have an opportunity to observe long-term efficacy profile of this drug in treatment-naive patients according to their initial disease activity. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of RRMS patients treated with FTY, focusing on 2 groups: 17 highly active patients (HA) defined as follows: ≥2 relapses in the year before treatment initiation and either≥1 Gd-enhancing T1 lesion or a significant increase in T2 lesion load from a baseline MRI; and 37 "not highly active" (NHA). We reviewed treatment efficacy (defined as NEDA-3), reasons for discontinuation and treatment tolerance in both groups. RESULTS: Mean follow-up duration was 48.2 months, SD 18.4. Fingolimod efficiently reduced relapses (NHA 90.3% reduction, P<0.001, HA 84.9%, P<0.001), and new Gd enhancing lesions (NHA 85.4% reduction, P=0.019, HA 92.3%, P=0.043). The proportion of patients reaching NEDA-3 status was higher in the NHA group (NHA: 80% at 2 years and 66% at 4 years, HA: 58% at 2 years and 38% at 4 years, P=0.042). Fingolimod was discontinued in 20 cases, mainly because of lack of efficacy (n=15). CONCLUSIONS: FTY is efficient in reducing relapses and new Gd enhancing lesions in both HA and NHA patients although the probability of achieving NEDA-3 over time is higher in early-treated treatment-naive NHA patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Cloridrato de Fingolimode Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente / Cloridrato de Fingolimode Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article