Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Direct to consumer genetic testing in Denmark-public knowledge, use, and attitudes.
Gerdes, Anne-Marie; Nicolaisen, Line; Husum, Egil; Andersen, Janne Bayer; Gantzhorn, Martin Dræbye; Roos, Laura; Diness, Birgitte Rode.
Afiliação
  • Gerdes AM; Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Anne-Marie.Gerdes@regionh.dk.
  • Nicolaisen L; Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Husum E; Bech-Bruun Law Firm P/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Andersen JB; Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Gantzhorn MD; Bech-Bruun Law Firm P/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Roos L; Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Diness BR; Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 29(5): 851-860, 2021 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33649540
ABSTRACT
Direct to consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) is offered by commercial companies, but the use in the general population has only been sparsely investigated. A questionnaire was sent to 2013 representative Danish citizens asking about their awareness and use of DTC-GT. Individuals who had undergone a genetic test were interviewed to determine if the results had been understood correctly. A pilot study with 2469 questionnaires was performed before this study. In total, 45.4% of the individuals (n = 913/2013) had knowledge about DTC-GT and 2.5% (n = (18 + 5)/913) previously had a genetic test by a private company and 5.8% through the public health care system (n = (48 + 5)/913). Curiosity about own genetic information was the most frequent motivation (40.9%, n = 9/22) as well as knowledge of ancestry (36.4%, n = 8/22) and advice about lifestyle, exercise, or diet (36.4%, n = 8/22). Test of own disease risk was given as a reason in 27.3% (n = 6/22) and seeking possible explanation of specific symptoms in 13.6% (n = 3/22). 50% (n = 11/22) answered that they had become concerned after the test, and 17.4% (n = 4/23) had consulted their GP. Interviews in a subset of respondents from the pilot study revealed problems with understanding the results. One problem was how to interpret the genetic test results with respect to individual risk for a disease. For example, the difference between disease causing genetic variants in monogenetic diseases versus statistical risks by SNPs in multifactorial diseases was not understood by the respondents.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Triagem e Testes Direto ao Consumidor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Genéticos / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Triagem e Testes Direto ao Consumidor Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article