Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Denial of tubal ligation in religious hospitals: Consumer attitudes when insurance limits hospital choice.
Schueler, Kellie E; Hebert, Luciana E; Wingo, Erin E; Freedman, Lori R; Stulberg, Debra B.
Afiliação
  • Schueler KE; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hebert LE; Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Wingo EE; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Freedman LR; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
  • Stulberg DB; Department of Family Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: stulberg@uchicago.edu.
Contraception ; 104(2): 194-201, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657425
OBJECTIVES: Postpartum tubal ligation provides demonstrated benefits to women, but access to this procedure is threatened by restrictions at Catholic healthcare institutions. We aimed to understand how insured employees assign responsibility for postpartum sterilization denial and how it impacts their view of the quality of care provided. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of employees at Standard and Poor's (S&P) 500 companies utilizing a dual panel drawn from Amerispeak, a probability-based research panel, and a non-probability panel. Respondents answered questions about a scenario of a woman denied a tubal ligation due to Catholic hospital policy when her employer-sponsored insurance provided no other hospital choices. Of 1113 eligible panel members, 1001 (90%) completed the survey. Weighted analysis accounted for complex survey design. RESULTS: In response to the tubal ligation denial scenario, 42% of respondents rated hospital quality-of-care as poor or very poor. Sixty percent felt that something should have been done differently, with about half assigning responsibility to the religiously-affiliated hospital for not providing the procedure and half to the insurance company for not including secular hospitals in its network. Finding employers/insurance companies responsible was more common with higher education (RRR = 3.17; 95% CI: 1.58-6.33 some college; RRR = 4.26; 95% CI: 2.10-8.62 bachelor's or more) and less common among non-white respondents (RRR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.31-0.97). Three quarters of respondents thought the employer should have intervened. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of insured employees do not think women should be denied postpartum tubal ligation. They assign hospitals, insurers, and employers responsibility to remove barriers to care. IMPLICATIONS: Most people who receive health insurance through a large employer disapprove of Catholic hospital restrictions when the patient's insurance restricts her hospital choice. To improve access to comprehensive reproductive care, employers and insurers should assure employees have in-network coverage of hospitals without religious restrictions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esterilização Tubária / Hospitais Religiosos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esterilização Tubária / Hospitais Religiosos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article