Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prosthetic choice in mitral valve replacement for severe chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: Long-term follow-up.
Bernard, Jérémy; Kalavrouziotis, Dimitri; Marzouk, Mohamed; Nader, Joseph; Bernier, Mathieu; Pibarot, Philippe; Mohammadi, Siamak.
Afiliação
  • Bernard J; Department of Cardiology, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Kalavrouziotis D; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Marzouk M; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Nader J; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Bernier M; Department of Cardiology, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Pibarot P; Department of Cardiology, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
  • Mohammadi S; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: Siamak.mohammadi@fmed.ulaval.ca.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 165(2): 634-644.e5, 2023 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33674062
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prosthetic choice for mitral valve replacement is generally driven by patient age and patient and surgeon preference, and current guidelines do not discriminate between different etiologies of mitral valve disease. Our objective was to assess and compare short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement among patients with biological or mechanical prostheses in the setting of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

METHODS:

Between 2000 and 2016, 424 patients underwent mitral valve replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation at our institution, using biological prosthesis in 188 (44%) and mechanical prosthesis in 236 (56%). A 11 propensity score match (n = 126 per group) and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare groups. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality and other cardiovascular adverse events. Long-term outcomes included survival and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes, stroke, and major bleeding.

RESULTS:

In-hospital mortality and early postoperative adverse events were similar between groups in the propensity score match and inverse probability of treatment weighting cohorts. Overall long-term survival was similar at 5 and 9 years, but mechanical prosthesis recipients were more frequently readmitted to hospital for cardiovascular causes, including stroke and non-neurological bleeding in propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses (all P values < .004). Type of prosthesis did not independently influence all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.43; P = .959), but placement of a mechanical prosthesis was associated with increased risk of readmission for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.32; P = .004) among matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

The type of prosthesis has no influence on long-term survival among patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve replacement. There may be an increased risk of neurologic events and serious bleeding associated with mechanical prostheses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Insuficiência da Valva Mitral Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article