[Geometric model of reduction in basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation and its clinical application].

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To establish a geometric model of the atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination reduction,and examine its value for clinical application. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery,First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from May 2018 to May 2020 was conducted.There were 5 males and 30 females,aged (48±15) years(range 19 to 69 years). The geometric model of the atlantoaxial reduction was established based on the mid-sagittal section of the cervical spine. The relevant data were calculated according to the geometric model before operation,and the fusion cage of the corresponding height was placed into C1-2 facet joint of patient for quantitative reduction. The theoretical reset value, actual reset value, postoperative symptoms and complications were collected. The paired t-test was used to compare the difference between theoretical and actual reset value to verify the reliability of the geometric model. Results: The theoretical vertical reduction distance of all patients was (5.79±2.96) mm(range1.52 to 10.96 mm),and the actual vertical reduction distance was (7.43±2.96)mm(range 1.40 to 12.77 mm),and there was no statistical difference between them(t=-1.96,P=0.069).The theoretical reduction angle was (10.80±2.24)°(range 7.09 to 14.86°), the actual reduction angle was (10.64±7.00)°(range 3.50 to 20.50°),and there was no statistical difference between them (t=0.09, P=0.933). At 6 months follow-up, 35 patients achieved satisfactory atlanto-axial joint fusion, and the symptoms were relieved. No internal fixation system displacement, fracture, wound infection and other complications occurred. Conclusion: This geometric model can estimate the vertical reduction distance and the reduction angle of the axial before operation,and provide a reference for the height of the fusion cage so as to avoid under or over-reduction.