Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of clinical outcomes, service satisfaction and well-being in people using acute day units and crisis resolution teams: cohort study in England.
Lamb, Danielle; Steare, Thomas; Marston, Louise; Canaway, Alastair; Johnson, Sonia; Kirkbride, James B; Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor; Morant, Nicola; Pinfold, Vanessa; Smith, Deb; Weich, Scott; Osborn, David P.
Afiliação
  • Lamb D; NIHR ARC North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, UK.
  • Steare T; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
  • Marston L; Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK.
  • Canaway A; Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, UK.
  • Johnson S; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
  • Kirkbride JB; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
  • Lloyd-Evans B; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
  • Morant N; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
  • Pinfold V; McPin Foundation, UK.
  • Smith D; McPin Foundation, UK.
  • Weich S; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
  • Osborn DP; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK; and Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
BJPsych Open ; 7(2): e68, 2021 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736743
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For people in mental health crisis, acute day units (ADUs) provide daily structured sessions and peer support in non-residential settings, often as an addition or alternative to crisis resolution teams (CRTs). There is little recent evidence about outcomes for those using ADUs, particularly compared with those receiving CRT care alone.

AIMS:

We aimed to investigate readmission rates, satisfaction and well-being outcomes for people using ADUs and CRTs.

METHOD:

We conducted a cohort study comparing readmission to acute mental healthcare during a 6-month period for ADU and CRT participants. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), well-being (Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) and depression (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale).

RESULTS:

We recruited 744 participants (ADU n = 431, 58%; CRT n = 312, 42%) across four National Health Service trusts/health regions. There was no statistically significant overall difference in readmissions 21% of ADU participants and 23% of CRT participants were readmitted over 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.14). However, readmission results varied substantially by setting. At follow-up, ADU participants had significantly higher Client Satisfaction Questionnaire scores (2.5, 95% CI 1.4-3.5, P < 0.001) and well-being scores (1.3, 95% CI 0.4-2.1, P = 0.004), and lower depression scores (-1.7, 95% CI -2.7 to -0.8, P < 0.001), than CRT participants.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients who accessed ADUs demonstrated better outcomes for satisfaction, well-being and depression, and no significant differences in risk of readmission, compared with those who only used CRTs. Given the positive outcomes for patients, and the fact that ADUs are inconsistently provided in the National Health Service, their value and place in the acute care pathway needs further consideration and research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article