Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vaginal streptococcus B colonization is not associated with increased infectious morbidity in labor induction.
Place, Katariina; Rahkonen, Leena; Nupponen, Irmeli; Kruit, Heidi.
Afiliação
  • Place K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Rahkonen L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Nupponen I; Department of Pediatrics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Kruit H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(8): 1501-1510, 2021 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33768531
INTRODUCTION: Labor induction rates are increasing and, in Finland today, one of three labors is induced. Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a bacterium found in 10%-30% of pregnant women and it can be transmitted to the neonate during vaginal delivery. Although GBS is rarely harmful in the general population, it is the leading cause of severe neonatal infections such as sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis. In addition, GBS can cause maternal morbidity. Labor induction in GBS-positive women has not yet been investigated but concerns of infectious morbidity associated with balloon catheters have been raised. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A historical cohort study of 1959 women undergoing labor induction by balloon catheter in Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2017. Women with viable singleton term pregnancy in cephalic presentation, unfavorable cervix (Bishop score <6), and intact amniotic membranes were included. GBS was screened by rapid qualitative in vitro test (XPert® GBS) from vaginal and perineal culture upon admission for labor induction. All women testing positive received prophylactic antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the women, 469 (23.9%) were GBS-positive. The rate of maternal intrapartum infection was 7.4%, being lower in the GBS-positive group compared with the GBS-negative group (4.7% vs 8.3%; p = 0.01). The rate of maternal postpartum infection was 3.9%, and the rate of neonatal infection was 3.3%, both being similar between the groups. Also, no difference in the rates of other adverse neonatal outcomes was seen. No GBS sepses occurred in the study. In multivariable logistic regression, rupture of membranes to delivery interval ≥12 hours was associated with maternal intrapartum and postpartum infection, as well as neonatal infection. Other risk factors for maternal intrapartum infection were GBS-negativity, nulliparity, prolonged pregnancy (≥41 weeks), and Bishop score <3 at the start of induction. Cesarean section was associated with postpartum endometritis, while nulliparity, gestational diabetes, and maternal intrapartum infection were associated with neonatal infection. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding maternal and neonatal infectious morbidity, labor induction with balloon catheter appears safe in women colonized with GBS when prophylactic antibiotics are administered at the onset of labor or at membrane rupture.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Vagina / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez / Infecções Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Vagina / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article