Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Higher Incidence of Radiographic Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis With Transtibial Femoral Tunnel Positioning Compared With Anteromedial Femoral Tunnel Positioning During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Cinque, Mark E; Kunze, Kyle N; Williams, Brady T; Moatshe, Gilbert; LaPrade, Robert F; Chahla, Jorge.
Afiliação
  • Cinque ME; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Kunze KN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
  • Williams BT; Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Moatshe G; OSTRC, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
  • LaPrade RF; Twin Cities Orthopedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
  • Chahla J; Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Am J Sports Med ; 50(1): 255-263, 2022 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769902
BACKGROUND: Anteromedial (AM) femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been reported by some authors to yield superior clinical and functional outcomes compared with the transtibial (TT) approach; however, differences in the subsequent rates of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) are not clear. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the influence of femoral tunnel positioning during primary ACLR on the development of radiographic PTOA. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and Meta-analysis. METHODS: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (1980-2019), and MEDLINE (1980-2019) were queried for all studies describing the development of PTOA after TT or AM ACLR. Data pertaining to patient demographics, ACLR technique, and radiographic PTOA were extracted. A meta-analysis utilizing the DerSimonian-Laird method for random effects was used to compare the weighted proportion of PTOA after ACLR between the TT and AM approaches. RESULTS: There were 16 studies identified for inclusion with a total of 1546 patients. The mean follow-up across all studies was 10.9 years (range, 5.4-17.8 years). The mean follow-up in the AM and TT groups was 10.8 years (range, 5.4-17 years) and 11.4 years (range, 6-17.8 years), respectively. A total of 783 (50.6%) patients underwent TT ACLR. Of these patients, 401 (weighted mean, 49.3%) developed radiographic PTOA. A total of 763 (49.4%) patients underwent AM ACLR. Of these patients, 166 (mean, 21.8%) went on to develop radiographic PTOA. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly greater rate of PTOA after ACLR using a TT technique compared with an AM technique overall (49.3% vs 25.4%, respectively; P < .001) and when studies were stratified by 5- to 10-year (53.7% vs 14.2%, respectively; P < .001) and greater than 10-year (45.6% vs 31.2%, respectively; P < .0001) follow-up. CONCLUSION: TT ACLR was associated with higher overall rates of radiographic PTOA compared with the AM ACLR approach. The rates of radiographic PTOA after ACLR with a TT approach were also significantly higher than using an AM approach when stratified by length of follow-up (5- to 10-year and >10-year follow-up).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite / Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior / Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article