Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combining respondent-driven sampling with a community-based participatory action study of people who smoke drugs in two cities in British Columbia, Canada.
Elkhalifa, Sulaf; Jozaghi, Ehsan; Marsh, Samona; Thomson, Erica; Gregg, Delilah; Buxton, Jane; Jolly, Ann.
Afiliação
  • Elkhalifa S; School of Public Health, Room 101, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, KIH 8M5, Canada.
  • Jozaghi E; UBC Faculty of Dentistry, Nobel Biocare Oral Health Centre, 2151 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
  • Marsh S; Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1P4, Canada.
  • Thomson E; British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1P4, Canada.
  • Gregg D; Sex Workers United Against Violence, 334 Alexander Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1C3, Canada.
  • Buxton J; Western Aboriginal Harm Reduction Society, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1P4, Canada.
  • Jolly A; British Columbia/Yukon Association of Drug War Survivors, 380 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1P4, Canada.
Harm Reduct J ; 18(1): 37, 2021 03 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771164
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The smoking of illicit drugs presents a serious social and economic burden in Canada. People who smoke drugs (PWSD) are at increased risk of contracting multiple infections through risky drug practices. Peer-led harm reduction activities, and the resulting social networks that form around them, can potentially minimize the dangers associated with the smoking illicit drugs. GOAL The goals of this study were to pilot test the combined approaches of respondent driven sampling with community based participatory action research in these settings and compare the attributes and social networks of PWSD in two British Columbia cities with different harm reduction programs.

METHODS:

Using community-based participatory action research (CBPAR) and respondent-driven sampling (RDS), individuals with lived drug experiences were employed from communities in Abbotsford and Vancouver as peer researchers to interview ten contacts from their social networks. Contacts completed a questionnaire about their harm reduction behaviours and interactions.

RESULTS:

We found that PWSD residing in Abbotsford were more likely to report engaging in harm-promoting behaviours, such as sharing, reusing, or borrowing crack pipes. However, PWSD in the Downtown East side Community of Vancouver were more likely to report engaging in harm-reducing activities, such as being trained in naloxone use and CPR. We found no differences in network sizes between the two communities, despite the population differences and harm reduction programs

CONCLUSION:

The high participation rates and interactions between researchers, and peer researchers enriched the study implementation and successfully informed our results. The fact that there were no differences in network size suggests that people have similar support in Vancouver as in Abbotsford, and that drug use practices differ mainly due to availability of harm reduction programming and resources.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumaça / Preparações Farmacêuticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumaça / Preparações Farmacêuticas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article