Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oncological outcomes of active surveillance and percutaneous cryoablation of small renal masses are similar at intermediate term follow-up.
Umari, Paolo; Rizzo, Michele; Billia, Michele; Stacul, Fulvio; Bertolotto, Michele; Cova, Maria A; Bondonno, Gianmarco; Perri, Davide; Liguori, Giovanni; Volpe, Alessandro; Trombetta, Carlo.
Afiliação
  • Umari P; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy - paoloumari@gmail.com.
  • Rizzo M; Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
  • Billia M; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Stacul F; Radiology Department, Maggiore Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
  • Bertolotto M; Radiology Department, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
  • Cova MA; Radiology Department, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
  • Bondonno G; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Perri D; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Liguori G; Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
  • Volpe A; Division of Urology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Trombetta C; Department of Urology, University of Trieste, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 74(3): 321-328, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33781019
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Active surveillance (AS) and minimally invasive ablative therapies such as percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) are emerging as alternative treatment modalities in the management of small renal masses (SRMs).

METHODS:

Fifty-nine patients underwent PCA since 2011 and 75 underwent AS since 2010 at two different institutions. Only patients with follow-up ≥6 months were included. All patients were followed with a standardized protocol. Treatment failure was defined by dimensional progression for AS and renal recurrence for PCA, in addition to stage and/or metastatic progression for both groups.

RESULTS:

Treatment failure was observed in 14 cases (18.7%) during AS (mainly due to dimensional progression) and 12 patients (16%) underwent delayed intervention with a mean follow-up of 36.83 months. Seven patients (11.9%) in the PCA group experienced treatment failure with a mean follow-up of 33.39 months and three of them underwent re-ablation successfully. Cancer-specific-survival at 2 and 5 years was 100% and 95,8% in AS-group vs. 98.2% and 98.2% in PCA-group (P=0.831). One patient in both groups died from metastatic disease. Overall-survival at 2 and 5 years was 91.7% and 82.4% in the AS group vs. 96.5% and 96.5% in the PCA group (P=0.113). Failure-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 90.9% and 70.1% in the AS group vs. 93.1% and 70.9% in the PCA group (P=0.645).

CONCLUSIONS:

AS and PCA provide similar survival outcomes and are safe and valid treatment options for elderly and comorbid patients with SRMs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criocirurgia / Neoplasias Renais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Criocirurgia / Neoplasias Renais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article