Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.
Reece, Jeanette C; Neal, Eleanor F G; Nguyen, Peter; McIntosh, Jennifer G; Emery, Jon D.
Afiliação
  • Reece JC; Colorectal Cancer Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. jreece@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Neal EFG; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. jreece@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Nguyen P; Infection and Immunity, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia.
  • McIntosh JG; Centre for International Child Health, Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  • Emery JD; Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Cancer ; 21(1): 373, 2021 Apr 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33827476
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Successful breast cancer screening relies on timely follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal mammograms undermines the potential benefits of screening and is associated with poorer outcomes. However, a comprehensive review of inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms in primary care has not previously been reported in the literature. This review could identify modifiable factors that influence follow-up, which if addressed, may lead to improved follow-up and patient outcomes.

METHODS:

A systematic literature review to determine the extent of inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms in primary care and identify factors impacting on follow-up was conducted. Relevant studies published between 1 January, 1990 and 29 October, 2020 were identified by searching MEDLINE®, Embase, CINAHL® and Cochrane Library, including reference and citation checking. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists were used to assess the risk of bias of included studies according to study design.

RESULTS:

Eighteen publications reporting on 17 studies met inclusion criteria; 16 quantitative and two qualitative studies. All studies were conducted in the United States, except one study from the Netherlands. Failure to follow-up abnormal screening mammograms within 3 and at 6 months ranged from 7.2-33% and 27.3-71.6%, respectively. Women of ethnic minority and lower education attainment were more likely to have inadequate follow-up. Factors influencing follow-up included physician-patient miscommunication, information overload created by automated alerts, the absence of adequate retrieval systems to access patient's results and a lack of coordination of patient records. Logistical barriers to follow-up included inconvenient clinic hours and inconsistent primary care providers. Patient navigation and case management with increased patient education and counselling by physicians was demonstrated to improve follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS:

Follow-up of abnormal mammograms in primary care is suboptimal. However, interventions addressing amendable factors that negatively impact on follow-up have the potential to improve follow-up, especially for populations of women at risk of inadequate follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Mamografia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article