Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient-reported outcomes in adult social care.
Hughes, Sarah E; Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee; Lasserson, Daniel S; Collis, Philip; Cruz Rivera, Samantha; McMullan, Christel; Turner, Grace M; Glasby, Jon; Calvert, Melanie.
Afiliação
  • Hughes SE; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK s.e.hughes@bham.ac.uk.
  • Aiyegbusi OL; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Lasserson DS; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Collis P; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Cruz Rivera S; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • McMullan C; National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Turner GM; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Glasby J; University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Calvert M; University of Warwick Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(4): e045206, 2021 04 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33849854
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person's own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient-practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care. METHODS AND ANALYSES The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical review is not required as scoping reviews are a form of secondary data analysis that synthesise data from publically available sources. Review findings will be shared with service users and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article