Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of a methylated DNA marker panel for the nonendoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus in a multisite case-control study.
Iyer, Prasad G; Taylor, William R; Slettedahl, Seth W; Lansing, Ramona L; Hemminger, Lois L; Cayer, Frances K; Mahoney, Douglas W; Giakoumopoulos, Maria; Allawi, Hatim T; Wu, Tsung-Teh; Wang, Kenneth K; Wolfsen, Herbert C; Antpack, Eduardo; Kisiel, John B.
Afiliação
  • Iyer PG; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Taylor WR; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Slettedahl SW; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lansing RL; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Hemminger LL; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Cayer FK; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Mahoney DW; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Giakoumopoulos M; Exact Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Allawi HT; Exact Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Wu TT; Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wang KK; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Wolfsen HC; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • Antpack E; Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System, Austin, Minnesota, USA.
  • Kisiel JB; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 94(3): 498-505, 2021 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33857451
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously identified a 5 methylated DNA marker (MDM) panel for the detection of nonendoscopic Barrett's esophagus (BE). In this study, we aimed to recalibrate the performance of the 5 MDM panel using a simplified assay in a training cohort, validate the panel in an independent test cohort, and explore the accuracy of an MDM panel with only 3 markers. METHODS: Participants were recruited from 3 medical centers. The sponge on a string device (EsophaCap; CapNostics, Concord, NC, USA) was swallowed and withdrawn, followed by endoscopy, in BE cases and control subjects. A 5 MDM panel was blindly assayed using a simplified assay. Random forest modeling analysis was performed, in silico cross-validated in the training set, and then locked down, before test set analysis. RESULTS: The training set had 199 patients: 110 BE cases and 89 control subjects, and the test set had 89 patients: 60 BE cases and 29 control subjects. Sensitivity of the 5 MDM panel for BE diagnosis was 93% at 90% specificity in the training set and 93% at 93% specificity in the test set. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were .96 and .97 in the training and test sets, respectively. Model accuracy was not influenced by age, sex, or smoking history. Multiple 3 MDM panels achieved similar accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: A 5 MDM panel for BE is highly accurate in training and test sets in a blinded multisite case-control analysis using a simplified assay. This panel may be reduced to only 3 MDMs in the future. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02560623.).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Esôfago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article