Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transpulmonary Pressure-Guided Lung-Protective Ventilation Improves Pulmonary Mechanics and Oxygenation Among Obese Subjects on Mechanical Ventilation.
Rowley, Daniel D; Arrington, Susan R; Enfield, Kyle B; Lamb, Keith D; Kadl, Alexandra; Davis, John P; Theodore, Danny J.
Afiliação
  • Rowley DD; Pulmonary Diagnostics & Respiratory Therapy Services, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia. ddr8a@virginia.edu.
  • Arrington SR; Pulmonary Diagnostics & Respiratory Therapy Services, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Enfield KB; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Lamb KD; Pulmonary Diagnostics & Respiratory Therapy Services, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Kadl A; Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Davis JP; Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
  • Theodore DJ; Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Respir Care ; 66(7): 1049-1058, 2021 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33879565
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transpulmonary pressure (PL) is used to assess pulmonary mechanics and guide lung-protective mechanical ventilation (LPV). PL is recommended to individualize LPV settings for patients with high pleural pressures and hypoxemia. We aimed to determine whether PL-guided LPV settings, pulmonary mechanics, and oxygenation improve and differ from non-PL-guided LPV among obese patients after 24 h on mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included classification of hypoxemia severity, count of ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, and overall ICU mortality.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective analysis of data. Ventilator settings, pulmonary mechanics, and oxygenation were recorded on the initial day of PL measurement and 24 h later. PL-guided LPV targeted inspiratory PL < 20 cm H2O and expiratory PL of 0-6 cm H2O. Comparisons were made to repeat measurements.

RESULTS:

Twenty subjects (13 male) with median age of 49 y, body mass index 47.5 kg/m2, and SOFA score of 8 were included in our analysis. Fourteen subjects received care in a medical ICU. PL measurement occurred 16 h after initiating non-PL-guided LPV. PL-guided LPV resulted in higher median PEEP (14 vs 18 cm H2O, P = .009), expiratory PL (-3 vs 1 cm H2O, P = .02), respiratory system compliance (30.7 vs 44.6 mL/cm H2O, P = .001), and [Formula see text] (156 vs 240 mm Hg, P = .002) at 24 h. PL-guided LPV resulted in lower [Formula see text] (0.53 vs 0.33, P < .001) and lower PL driving pressure (10 vs 6 cm H2O, P = .001). Tidal volume (420 vs 435 mL, P = .64) and inspiratory PL (7 vs 7 cm H2O, P = .90) were similar. Subjects had a median of 7 ventilator-free days, and median ICU length of stay was 14 d. Three of 20 subjects died within 28 d after ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS:

PL-guided LPV resulted in higher PEEP, lower [Formula see text], improved pulmonary mechanics, and greater oxygenation when compared to non-PL-guided LPV settings in adult obese subjects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Respiração com Pressão Positiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Respiração Artificial / Respiração com Pressão Positiva Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article