Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of propolis in remineralising artificially induced demineralisation of human enamel - An in-vitro study.
Ali, Saqib; Farooq, Imran; Bugshan, Amr; Siddiqui, Intisar Ahmad; Al-Khalifa, Khalifa S; Al-Hariri, Mohammed.
Afiliação
  • Ali S; Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
  • Farooq I; Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
  • Bugshan A; Department of Biomedical Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
  • Siddiqui IA; Department of Quality Assurance, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
  • Al-Khalifa KS; Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
  • Al-Hariri M; Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA.
J Taibah Univ Med Sci ; 16(2): 283-287, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33897335
OBJECTIVE: In this in vitro study, we aimed to analyse the enamel-remineralisation potential of propolis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty enamel blocks (N = 20) were randomly divided into two groups (n = 10). In group 1 (control), enamel blocks were brushed with artificial saliva (AS). In group 2, they were brushed with propolis oil. All the blocks were demineralised by exposing them to 6 wt% citric acid (pH: 2.2) for 5 min. Brushing was performed inside a tooth brushing simulation machine with manual toothbrushes. Each sample received 5,000 linear strokes. Surface microhardness analysis was performed for each sample at three time intervals (pre-demineralisation or baseline, post-demineralisation, and post-remineralisation) to obtain the Vickers hardness numbers (VHNs). RESULTS: An enhancement in the microhardness of the enamel samples was observed after brushing with propolis oil when compared with brushing using AS alone. In group 1 (control group), the mean baseline VHN was 583.66. It decreased to 116.23 after demineralisation and increased to 184.02 after remineralisation. The mean baseline VHN of group 2 was 506.91. It decreased to 317.60 after demineralisation and increased to 435.19 after remineralisation. The VHN values of both the groups revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in inter-group and intra-group comparisons. CONCLUSION: Brushing of enamel blocks with propolis led to a greater enhancement in their microhardness levels when compared with the control group. Future studies are essential to validate the exact mechanism of the beneficial effects of propolis on enamel.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article