Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pembrolizumab Versus Combined Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel: A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Platinum-refractory Advanced Urothelial Cancer.
Takemura, Ayana; Matsushita, Yuto; Tamura, Keita; Sugiyama, Takayuki; Nagata, Masao; Otsuka, Atsushi; Miyake, Hideaki.
Afiliação
  • Takemura A; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Matsushita Y; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Tamura K; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Sugiyama T; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Nagata M; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Otsuka A; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Miyake H; Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
In Vivo ; 35(3): 1889-1894, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33910878
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIM:

There are limited data on comprehensive assessments of several treatments as second-line therapy against advanced urothelial cancer (UC). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between advanced UC patients receiving either pembrolizumab (Pem) or combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) as second-line therapy. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 89 patients with platinum-refractory advanced UC, consisting of 46 and 43 who received Pem and GP therapy, respectively, as second-line treatment.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in major clinicopathological parameters between Pem and GP groups. No significant difference in the objective response rate was noted between the two groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the Pem group was significantly longer than that in the GP group; however, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between them. Multivariate analyses identified performance status ≤2 and liver metastasis as independent factors associated with poor outcomes in both PFS and OS. The incidence of adverse events in the GP group was significantly higher than that in the Pem group.

CONCLUSION:

Pem could be regarded as standard agent for platinum-refractory advanced UC patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Platina / Carcinoma de Células de Transição Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Platina / Carcinoma de Células de Transição Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article