Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance and Determinants of Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C-Based GFR Estimating Equations in South Asians.
Wang, Yeli; Levey, Andrew S; Inker, Lesley A; Jessani, Saleem; Bux, Rasool; Samad, Zainab; Khan, Ali Raza; Karger, Amy B; Allen, John C; Jafar, Tazeen H.
Afiliação
  • Wang Y; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
  • Levey AS; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Inker LA; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Jessani S; Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Bux R; Department of Pediatrics (Division of Women and Child Health), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Samad Z; Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Khan AR; Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Karger AB; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Allen JC; Center for Quantitative Medicine, Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
  • Jafar TH; Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Kidney Int Rep ; 6(4): 962-975, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33912746
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation was calibrated for the general Pakistan population (eGFRcr-PK) to eliminate bias and improve accuracy. Cystatin C-based CKD-EPI equations (eGFRcys and eGFRcr-cys) have not been assessed in this population, and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C are unknown.

METHODS:

We assessed eGFRcys, eGFRcr-cys, and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C in a cross-sectional study of 557 participants (≥40 years of age) from Pakistan. We compared bias (median difference in measured GFR [mGFR] and eGFR), precision (interquartile range [IQR] of differences), accuracy (percentage of eGFR within 30% of mGFR), root mean square error (RMSE), and classification of mGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] and net reclassification index [NRI]) among eGFR equations.

RESULTS:

We found that eGFRcys underestimated mGFR (bias, 12.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% confidence interval {CI} 10.7-15.2]). eGFRcr-cys did not improve performance over eGFRcr-PK in precision (P = 0.52), accuracy (P = 0.58), or RMSE (P = 0.49). Results were consistent among subgroups by age, sex, smoking, body mass index (BMI), and eGFR. NRI was 7.31% (95% CI 1.52%-13.1%; P < 0.001) for eGFRcr-cys versus eGFRcr-PK, but AUC was not improved (0.92 [95% CI 0.87-0.96] vs. 0.90 [95% CI 0.86-0.95]; P = 0.056). Non-GFR determinants of higher cystatin C included male sex, smoking, higher BMI and total body fat, and lower lean body mass.

CONCLUSION:

eGFRcys underestimated mGFR in South Asians and eGFRcr-cys did not offer substantial advantage compared with eGFRcr-PK. Future studies are warranted to better understand the large bias in eGFRcys and non-GFR determinants of cystatin C in South Asians.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article