Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cervical ripening at home or in-hospital-prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study: a protocol.
Stock, Sarah Jane; Bhide, Amarnath; Richardson, Heather; Black, Mairead; Yuill, Cassandra; Harkness, Mairi; Reid, Maggie; Wee, Fiona; Cheyne, Helen; McCourt, Christine; Rana, Dikshyanta; Boyd, Kathleen Anne; Sanders, Julia; Heera, Neelam; Huddleston, Jane; Denison, Fiona; Pasupathy, Dharmintra; Modi, Neena; Smith, Gordon; Norrie, John.
Afiliação
  • Stock SJ; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK sarah.stock@ed.ac.uk.
  • Bhide A; Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals Trust, London, UK.
  • Richardson H; Women and Children's Health, NHS Lothian University Hospitals Division, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Black M; Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Yuill C; Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Harkness M; Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP), University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • Reid M; Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Wee F; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (ECTU) Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Cheyne H; Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit (NMAHP), University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
  • McCourt C; Centre for Maternal & Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK.
  • Rana D; Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Boyd KA; Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  • Sanders J; School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
  • Heera N; Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Huddleston J; Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Denison F; MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Pasupathy D; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Modi N; Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Smith G; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  • Norrie J; Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit (ECTU) Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(5): e050452, 2021 05 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33947741
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The aim of the cervical ripening at home or in-hospital-prospective cohort study and process evaluation (CHOICE) study is to compare home versus in-hospital cervical ripening to determine whether home cervical ripening is safe (for the primary outcome of neonatal unit (NNU) admission), acceptable to women and cost-effective from the perspective of both women and the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

We will perform a prospective multicentre observational cohort study with an internal pilot phase. We will obtain data from electronic health records from at least 14 maternity units offering only in-hospital cervical ripening and 12 offering dinoprostone home cervical ripening. We will also conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed methods study to evaluate processes and women/partner experiences. Our primary sample size is 8533 women with singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labour (IOL) at 39+0 weeks' gestation or more. To achieve this and contextualise our findings, we will collect data relating to a cohort of approximately 41 000 women undergoing IOL after 37 weeks. We will use mixed effects logistic regression for the non-inferiority comparison of NNU admission and propensity score matched adjustment to control for treatment indication bias. The economic analysis will be undertaken from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) and the pregnant woman. It will include a within-study cost-effectiveness analysis and a lifetime cost-utility analysis to account for any long-term impacts of the cervical ripening strategies. Outcomes will be reported as incremental cost per NNU admission avoided and incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained. RESEARCH ETHICS APPROVAL AND DISSEMINATION CHOICE has been funded and approved by the National Institute of Healthcare Research Health Technology and Assessment, and the results will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN32652461.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Maturidade Cervical Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Estatal / Maturidade Cervical Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article