Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methods for dose quantification in continuous renal replacement therapy: Toward a more precise approach.
Villa, Gianluca; Fabbri, Sergio; Samoni, Sara; Cecchi, Matteo; Fioccola, Antonio; Scirè-Calabrisotto, Caterina; Mari, Gaia; Pomarè Montin, Diego; Romagnoli, Stefano.
Afiliação
  • Villa G; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Fabbri S; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
  • Samoni S; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Cecchi M; Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, ASST Lariana, S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy.
  • Fioccola A; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Industrial PhD in Clinical Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Scirè-Calabrisotto C; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Mari G; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Pomarè Montin D; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Romagnoli S; Department of Health Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Artif Organs ; 45(11): 1300-1307, 2021 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948973
Periodic dose assessment is quintessential for dynamic dose adjustment and quality control of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). The flows-based methods to estimate dose are easy and reproducible methods to quantify (estimate) CRRT dose at the bedside. In particular, quantification of effluent flow and, mainly, the current dose (adjusted for dialysate, replacement, blood flows, and net ultrafiltration) is routinely used in clinical practice. Unfortunately, these methods are critically influenced by several external unpredictable factors; the estimated dose often overestimates the real biological delivered dose quantified through the measurement of urea clearance (the current effective delivered dose). Although the current effective delivered dose is undoubtedly more precise than the flows-based dose estimation in quantifying CRRT efficacy, some limitations are reported for the urea-based measurement of dose. This article aims to describe the standard of practice for dose quantification in critically ill patients with AKI undergoing CRRT in the intensive care unit. Pitfalls of current methods will be underlined, along with solutions potentially applicable to obtain more precise results in terms of (a) adequate marker solutes that should be used in accordance with the clinical scenario, (b) correct sampling procedures depending on the chosen indicator of transmembrane removal, (c) formulas for calculations, and (d) quality controls and benchmark indicators.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções para Hemodiálise / Injúria Renal Aguda / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Soluções para Hemodiálise / Injúria Renal Aguda / Terapia de Substituição Renal Contínua Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article