Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrating behaviour change interventions and patient decision aids: How to accomplish synergistic effects?
Gültzow, Thomas; Hoving, Ciska; Smit, Eline Suzanne; Bekker, Hilary L.
Afiliação
  • Gültzow T; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: thomas.gultzow@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
  • Hoving C; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Smit ES; Department of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Bekker HL; Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Research Centre for Patient Involvement (ResCenPI), Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Patient Educ Couns ; 104(12): 3104-3108, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33952401
People make numerous health-related choices each day: For example, deciding to brush one's teeth or to eat well and healthy - or not to do these activities. To support complex decisions and subsequent behaviour change, both Behaviour Change Interventions (BCIs) and Patient Decision Aids (PtDAs) have been developed and evolved independently to support people in health-related decision making. In this paper, we critically review BCIs and PtDAs, examine their similarities and differences, and identify potential for integration of expertise to increase the benefits for people engaging with healthcare and health behaviours. The two approaches appear to mainly differ in terms of their (1) goals and foci, (2) theoretical basis, (3) development frameworks, (4) active ingredients and (5) effect evaluation. To facilitate the integration of scientific insights from these two fields, we recommend to (1) bring both fields together and promote interprofessional discussions, (2) train (health) professionals to recognise strengths of both approaches, (3) investigate the synergy of the two fields, (4) be prepared for and try to mitigate a culture shock when the fields start to interact. Knowledge generated by researching PtDAs could be used to facilitate decisional processes that enable patients to choose goals that are in line with their values and preferences, while insights from researching BCIs could be used to facilitate engagement with, and implementation of those goals. This integration could allow researchers and intervention providers to increase the benefits for people engaging with healthcare and health behaviours.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Participação do Paciente / Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article