Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Role of a successful spontaneous breathing trial in ventilator liberation in brain-injured patients.
Shi, Zhong-Hua; Jonkman, Annemijn H; Tuinman, Pieter Roel; Chen, Guang-Qiang; Xu, Ming; Yang, Yan-Lin; Heunks, Leo M A; Zhou, Jian-Xin.
Afiliação
  • Shi ZH; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Jonkman AH; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tuinman PR; Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Chen GQ; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Xu M; Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Yang YL; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Heunks LMA; Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Zhou JX; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(7): 548, 2021 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33987246
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) have been shown to improve outcomes in critically ill patients. However, in patients with brain injury, indications for intubation and mechanical ventilation are different from those of non-neurological patients, and the role of an SBT in patients with brain injury is less established. The aim of the present study was to compare key respiratory variables acquired during a successful SBT between patients with successful ventilator liberation versus failed ventilator liberation.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, patients with brain injury (≥18 years of age), who completed a 30-min SBT, were enrolled. Airway pressure, flow, esophageal pressure, and diaphragm electrical activity (ΔEAdi) were recorded before (baseline) and during the SBT. Respiratory rate (RR), tidal volume, inspiratory muscle pressure (ΔPmus), ΔEAdi, and neuromechanical efficiency (ΔPmus/ΔEAdi) of the diaphragm were calculated breath by breath and compared between the liberation success and failure groups. Failed liberation was defined as the need for invasive ventilator assistance within 48 h after the SBT.

RESULTS:

In total, 46 patients (51.9±13.2 years, 67.4% male) completed the SBT. Seventeen (37%) patients failed ventilator liberation within 48 h. Another 11 patients required invasive ventilation within 7 days after completing the SBT. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the success and failed groups. In-depth analysis showed similar changes in patterns and values of respiratory physiological parameters between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with brain injury, ventilator liberation failure was common after successful SBT. In-depth physiological analysis during the SBT did not provide data to predict successful liberation in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02863237).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article