Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guidance for researchers wanting to link NHS data using non-consent approaches: a thematic analysis of feedback from the Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group.
Cross, Lauren; Carson, Lauren Emma; Jewell, Amelia; Heslin, Margaret; Osborn, David; Downs, Johnny; Stewart, Robert.
Afiliação
  • Cross L; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
  • Carson LE; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
  • Jewell A; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
  • Heslin M; Department of Health Services & Population Research, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
  • Osborn D; Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, Bloomsbury, London W1T 7BN, UK.
  • Downs J; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
  • Stewart R; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK.
Int J Popul Data Sci ; 5(1): 1355, 2020 Oct 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34007881
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The use of linked data and non-consent methodologies is a rapidly growing area of health research due to the increasing detail, availability and scope of routinely collected electronic health records data. However, gaining the necessary legal and governance approvals to undertake data linkage is a complex process in England.

OBJECTIVES:

We reflect on our own experience of establishing lawful basis for data linkage through Section 251 approval, with the intention to build a knowledgebase of practical advice for future applicants.

METHODS:

Thematic analysis was conducted on a corpus of Section 251 feedback reports from the NHS Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group.

RESULTS:

Four themes emerged from the feedback. These were (a) Patient and Public Involvement, (b) Establishing Rationale, (c) Data maintenance and contingency, and the need to gain (d) Further Permissions from external authorities prior to full approval.

CONCLUSIONS:

Securing Section 251 approval poses ethical, practical and governance challenges. However, through a comprehensive, planned approach Section 251 approval is possible, enabling researchers to unlock the potential of linked data for the purposes of health research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article