Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical value of radiomics and machine learning in breast ultrasound: a multicenter study for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions.
Romeo, Valeria; Cuocolo, Renato; Apolito, Roberta; Stanzione, Arnaldo; Ventimiglia, Antonio; Vitale, Annalisa; Verde, Francesco; Accurso, Antonello; Amitrano, Michele; Insabato, Luigi; Gencarelli, Annarita; Buonocore, Roberta; Argenzio, Maria Rosaria; Cascone, Anna Maria; Imbriaco, Massimo; Maurea, Simone; Brunetti, Arturo.
Afiliação
  • Romeo V; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Cuocolo R; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Apolito R; Laboratory of Augmented Reality for Health Monitoring (ARHeMLab), Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Stanzione A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Ventimiglia A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. arnaldo.stanzione@unina.it.
  • Vitale A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Verde F; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Accurso A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Amitrano M; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Insabato L; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Gencarelli A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Buonocore R; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Argenzio MR; Department of Radiology, A.O.U. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
  • Cascone AM; Department of Radiology, A.O.U. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
  • Imbriaco M; Department of Radiology, A.O.U. San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
  • Maurea S; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
  • Brunetti A; Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Eur Radiol ; 31(12): 9511-9519, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34018057
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to assess the performance of radiomics and machine learning (ML) for classification of non-cystic benign and malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images, compare ML's accuracy with that of a breast radiologist, and verify if the radiologist's performance is improved by using ML.

METHODS:

Our retrospective study included patients from two institutions. A total of 135 lesions from Institution 1 were used to train and test the ML model with cross-validation. Radiomic features were extracted from manually annotated images and underwent a multistep feature selection process. Not reproducible, low variance, and highly intercorrelated features were removed from the dataset. Then, 66 lesions from Institution 2 were used as an external test set for ML and to assess the performance of a radiologist without and with the aid of ML, using McNemar's test.

RESULTS:

After feature selection, 10 of the 520 features extracted were employed to train a random forest algorithm. Its accuracy in the training set was 82% (standard deviation, SD, ± 6%), with an AUC of 0.90 (SD ± 0.06), while the performance on the test set was 82% (95% confidence intervals (CI) = 70-90%) with an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-0.93). It resulted in being significantly better than the baseline reference (p = 0.0098), but not different from the radiologist (79.4%, p = 0.815). The radiologist's performance improved when using ML (80.2%), but not significantly (p = 0.508).

CONCLUSIONS:

A radiomic analysis combined with ML showed promising results to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions on ultrasound images. KEY POINTS • Machine learning showed good accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant breast lesions • The machine learning classifier's performance was comparable to that of a breast radiologist • The radiologist's accuracy improved with machine learning, but not significantly.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Mamária / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ultrassonografia Mamária / Aprendizado de Máquina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article