Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Advantages of an Automated Method Compared With Manual Methods for the Quantification of Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber in Skin Biopsy.
Corrà, Marta Francisca; Sousa, Mafalda; Reis, Inês; Tanganelli, Fabiana; Vila-Chã, Nuno; Sousa, Ana Paula; Magalhães, Rui; Sampaio, Paula; Taipa, Ricardo; Maia, Luís.
Afiliação
  • Corrà MF; From the Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto.
  • Sousa M; Instituto de investigação e inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto (i3S), Porto, Portugal.
  • Reis I; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP).
  • Tanganelli F; Department of Medicine IV, Geriatrics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Vila-Chã N; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP).
  • Sousa AP; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP).
  • Magalhães R; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP).
  • Sampaio P; Instituto de investigação e inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto (i3S), Porto, Portugal.
  • Taipa R; From the Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto.
  • Maia L; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP).
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol ; 80(7): 685-694, 2021 08 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34041546
ABSTRACT
Intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) measurements in skin biopsy are performed manually by 1-3 operators. To improve diagnostic accuracy and applicability in clinical practice, we developed an automated method for fast IENFD determination with low operator-dependency. Sixty skin biopsy specimens were stained with the axonal marker PGP9.5 and imaged using a widefield fluorescence microscope. IENFD was first determined manually by 3 independent observers. Subsequently, images were processed in their Z-max projection and the intradermal line was delineated automatically. IENFD was calculated automatically (fluorescent images automated counting [FIAC]) and compared with manual counting on the same fluorescence images (fluorescent images manual counting [FIMC]), and with classical manual counting (CMC) data. A FIMC showed lower variability among observers compared with CMC (interclass correlation [ICC] = 0.996 vs 0.950). FIMC and FIAC showed high reliability (ICC = 0.999). A moderate-to-high (ICC = 0.705) was observed between CMC and FIAC counting. The algorithm process took on average 15 seconds to perform FIAC counting, compared with 10 minutes for FIMC counting. This automated method rapidly and reliably detects small nerve fibers in skin biopsies with clear advantages over the classical manual technique.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Axônios / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Epiderme Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Axônios / Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Epiderme Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article